Cited by 18Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesCongenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Refinements in otoplasty surgery: experience of 200 consecutive cases using cartilage-sparing technique.

Mazeed, Ahmed S., Bulstrode, Neil W.·2019·Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many techniques have been described to correct prominent ears, including cartilage-suturing, cartilage-scoring, and cartilage-breaking techniques. Understanding the topography and anatomy of the auricular cartilage is crucial for performing safe otoplasty with consistent results. METHODS: Two hundred consecutive patients with prominent ears were operated on using a modified Mustardé and Furnas technique with some refinements and without performing any cartilage scoring or excision. Adequate dissection and exposure of cartilage and precise repositioning of the tail of helix (cauda helicis) are keys to correction of lobule prominence without the need for any adjunctive procedures such as skin excision from the back of the lobule or suture fixation of the lobular tissues to the concha, mastoid, or scalp. Detailed description of the technique and review of the complications are presented. RESULTS: This suturing-only technique had a low complication rate. Hematoma occurred in two patients only. Skin necrosis and wound dehiscence were not reported in any patient. Suture extrusion was the most common complication and was easily managed, mostly in the clinic. Relapse of deformity needing surgical correction occurred in eight cases. CONCLUSIONS: The series demonstrates that most of the potential complications of otoplasty can be avoided and favorable results can be obtained by paying attention to the anatomical details of the deformity and the auricular cartilage anatomy. The described cartilage-sparing otoplasty procedure with the refinements outlined resulted in a reproducible natural correction, with a low risk profile, that can be applied to almost all prominent ears. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/prs.0000000000005704

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Luckett, 1910, A new operation for prominent ears based on the anatomy of the deformity., Surg Gynecol Obstet, 10, 635

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mazeed, A. S., & Bulstrode, N. W.
Affiliations
Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB)
Venue
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2019-07
Volume
144
Issue
1
Pages
72-80
ISSN
0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2936751222
Cited by
18
References
37
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics (clinical) › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Keywords
otoplasty, prominent ears, suture extrusion, postoperative complications, deformity recurrence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Ear Cartilage, Ear, External, Female, Humans, Male, Postoperative Complications, Recurrence, Otologic Surgical Procedures, Suture Techniques, Young Adult, Wound Closure Techniques, Organ Sparing Treatments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review