The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Refinements in otoplasty surgery: experience of 200 consecutive cases using cartilage-sparing technique.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many techniques have been described to correct prominent ears, including cartilage-suturing, cartilage-scoring, and cartilage-breaking techniques. Understanding the topography and anatomy of the auricular cartilage is crucial for performing safe otoplasty with consistent results. METHODS: Two hundred consecutive patients with prominent ears were operated on using a modified Mustardé and Furnas technique with some refinements and without performing any cartilage scoring or excision. Adequate dissection and exposure of cartilage and precise repositioning of the tail of helix (cauda helicis) are keys to correction of lobule prominence without the need for any adjunctive procedures such as skin excision from the back of the lobule or suture fixation of the lobular tissues to the concha, mastoid, or scalp. Detailed description of the technique and review of the complications are presented. RESULTS: This suturing-only technique had a low complication rate. Hematoma occurred in two patients only. Skin necrosis and wound dehiscence were not reported in any patient. Suture extrusion was the most common complication and was easily managed, mostly in the clinic. Relapse of deformity needing surgical correction occurred in eight cases. CONCLUSIONS: The series demonstrates that most of the potential complications of otoplasty can be avoided and favorable results can be obtained by paying attention to the anatomical details of the deformity and the auricular cartilage anatomy. The described cartilage-sparing otoplasty procedure with the refinements outlined resulted in a reproducible natural correction, with a low risk profile, that can be applied to almost all prominent ears. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the authors' earlier study, polydioxanone led to a marked increase in the incidence of recurrence.
“polydioxanone led to marked increase in the incidence of recurrence in our earlier study. 18”
In the authors' earlier study of cartilage-sparing technique without the postauricular flap, 17 out of 200 patients had suture extrusion (P = 0.001).
“in our earlier study of cartilage-sparing technique without the postauricular flap, 17 out of 200 cases had suture extrusion ( P = 0.001) (Table 1).”
Suture extrusion has been reported to be the most common complication after cartilage-sparing otoplasty.
“Suture extrusion has been reported to be the most common complication after cartilage-sparing otoplasty. 17,18”
In the authors' earlier study, polypropylene sutures caused discomfort in several patients.
“we previously found polypropylene sutures to cause discomfort in several patients”
Citations
Cites
The distortion of autogenous cartilage grafts: Its cause and prevention.
Gibson, T., & Davis, W. B. (1957) · British Journal of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0007-1226(57)80042-3 · Cited by 451
The correction of prominent ears using simple mattress sutures
Mustardé, J. C. (1963) · British Journal of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0007-1226(63)80100-9 · Cited by 426
Correction of prominent ears by concha-mastoid sutures
FURNAS, D. W. (1968) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-196809000-00001 · Cited by 329
A “NATURAL” TECHNIQUE FOR CORRECTION OF CONGENITALLY PROMINENT EARS
STENSTRÖM, S. J. (1963) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-196311000-00003 · Cited by 328
Dieffenbach, J. F. (1845) · Cited by 282
A method of antihelix reconstruction
Chongchet, V. (1963) · British Journal of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0007-1226(63)80120-4 · Cited by 219
A TECHNIQUE FOR SURGICAL CORRECTION OF LOP EARS
Converse, J. M., Nigro, A., WILSON, F. A., & JOHNSON, N. (1955) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-195505000-00004 · Cited by 192
Janis, J. E., Rohrich, R. J., & Gutowski, K. A. (2005) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000156218.93855.c9 · Cited by 159
Otoplasty: Evaluation, Technique, and Review
Kelley, P., Hollier, L., & Stal, S. (2003) · Journal of Craniofacial Surgery · doi:10.1097/00001665-200309000-00008 · Cited by 142
Morbidity of otoplasty: a review of 562 consecutive cases
Calder, J. C., & Naasan, A. (1994) · British Journal of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1016/0007-1226(94)90049-3 · Cited by 136
TECHNICAL DETAILS IN THE SURGICAL CORRECTION OF THE LOP EAR DEFORMITY
Converse, J. M., & Wood‐Smith, D. (1963) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-196302000-00002 · Cited by 113
The postauricular fascial flap as an adjunct to Mustardé and Furnas type otoplasty.
Horlock, N., Misra, A., & Gault, D. T. (2001) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-200111000-00005 · Cited by 102
Otoplasty: Anterior Scoring Technique and Results in 500 Cases
Caouette‐Laberge, L., Guay, N. A., Bortoluzzi, P. A., & Belleville, C. (2000) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-200002000-00004 · Cited by 100
Ear deformities: social and psychological implications
MacGregor, F. C. (1978) · Clinics in Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0094-1298(20)32138-6 · Cited by 99
Adamson, P., & Strecker, H. (1995) · Facial Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1055/s-2008-1064545 · Cited by 96
The benefits of otoplasty for children: Further evidence to satisfy the modern NHS
Cooper-Hobson, G., & Jaffe, W. (2007) · Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2007.09.020 · Cited by 82
Complications in the treatment of prominent ears
Elliott, R. A. (1978) · Clinics in Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0094-1298(20)32154-4 · Cited by 73
Complications following correction of prominent ears: an audit review of 122 cases
Jeffery, S. (1999) · British Journal of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1054/bjps.1999.3183 · Cited by 67
Otoplasty: A Combined Approach
Elliott, R. A. (1990) · Clinics in Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0094-1298(20)31251-7 · Cited by 58
THE TAIL OF THE HELIX AS A KEY TO OTOPLASTY
Webster, G. V. (1969) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-196944050-00007 · Cited by 57
CORRECTION OF THE PRINCIPAL DEFORMITIES CAUSING PROTRUDING EARS
Spira, M., McCREA, R., GEROW, F. J., & HARDY, B. S. (1969) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-196944020-00007 · Cited by 47
The Post-Meeting “Wear-You-Out” Syndrome in Cosmetic Surgery
Rohrich, R. J. (2001) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-200109150-00038 · Cited by 46
The Protruding Ear: Cosmetic and Reconstruction
Ali, K., Meaike, J. D., Maricevich, R., & Olshinka, A. (2017) · Seminars in Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1055/s-0037-1604241 · Cited by 46
Ear Deformities, Otoplasty, and Ear Reconstruction
Thorne, C. H. M., & Wilkes, G. H. (2012) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e3182450d9f · Cited by 45
CORRECTION OF THE PRINCIPAL DEFORMITIES CAUSING PROTRUDING EARS
Spira, M., McCREA, R., GEROW, F. J., & HARDY, B. S. (1969) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-196908000-00007 · Cited by 35
THE TAIL OF THE HELIX AS A KEY TO OTOPLASTY
Webster, G. V. (1969) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-196911000-00007 · Cited by 33
Otoplasty: Anterior Scoring and Posterior Rolling Technique in Adults
Peker, F., & Çeli̇köz, B. (2002) · Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00266-002-2028-4 · Cited by 30
A Novel Approach to Correction of the Prominent Lobule during Otoplasty
Gosain, A. K., & Recinos, R. F. (2003) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000071000.80092.2a · Cited by 29
Otoplasty: the problem of the deep conchal bowl
Beasley, N. J. P., & Jones, N. S. (1996) · The Journal of Laryngology & Otology · doi:10.1017/s0022215100135182 · Cited by 25
Stewart, K. J., & Lancerotto, L. (2017) · Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.fsc.2017.09.002 · Cited by 25
Otoplasty: The Experience of 100 Consecutive Patients
Yugueros, P., & Friedland, J. A. (2001) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-200109150-00039 · Cited by 20
Otoplasty for prominent ears: personal technique and review of 150 consecutive cases
Colpaert, S. D. M., & Missotten, F. E. M. (2005) · European Journal of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00238-005-0738-y · Cited by 10
Firmin, F., Dusseldorp, J., & Marchac, A. C. (2017) · Cited by 6
Otoplasty: The case for skin incision by higher volume operators
Arkoulis, N., Reid, J., Neill, C. O. A., & Stewart, K. J. (2014) · Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2014.10.022 · Cited by 4
Cugno, S., & Bulstrode, N. (2015) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118655412.ch19 · Cited by 2
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Luckett, 1910, A new operation for prominent ears based on the anatomy of the deformity., Surg Gynecol Obstet, 10, 635
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Otoplasty: Rasps or Puncture Needles? A Clinical Trial
Zanin, E. M., Maximiliano, J., Oliveira, A. C. P., Arpini, N. E., Duarte, D. W., Portinho, C. P., & Collares, M. V. M. (2020) · Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00266-020-01972-z · Cited by 11
Lese, I., Aldabbas, M., Mazeed, A. S., & Bulstrode, N. (2021) · Annals of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1097/sap.0000000000002888 · Cited by 10
Self-citationOtoplasty: a modified Chong-Chet technique with positive long-term results
Jović, D., Preradović, L., & Guzijan, A. (2021) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000027554 · Cited by 9
Cartilage-Sparing Otoplasty: A Systematic Review
Ferzli, G., Sukato, D. C., Araslanova, R., & Romo, T. (2020) · Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine · doi:10.1089/fpsam.2020.0123 · Cited by 9
Lop Ear to Conchal Microtia: An Algorithmic Surgical Approach.
Leşe, I., Aldabbas, M., Mazeed, A. S., & Bulstrode, N. (2022) · Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) · doi:10.48350/164534 · Cited by 8
Self-citationComplications of Cartilage Sparing Otoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Alanazi, H. (2024) · Journal of Craniofacial Surgery · doi:10.1097/scs.0000000000009976 · Cited by 6
Cartilage-Sparing Otoplasty: A New Approach
Benkler, M., Weiss, N., Egozi, D., Dolgunin, L., & Kouniavski, E. (2023) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000010401 · Cited by 6
Dong, L. (2023) · Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2023.02.007 · Cited by 5
Bulstrode, N. W., Ronde, E. M., & Mazeed, A. S. (2024) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000011342 · Cited by 4
Self-citationModified bilateral fasciaperichondrial flap for prominent ear correction
Aysel, A., Karatan, B., Ergün, U., & Müderris, T. (2023) · Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology · doi:10.1016/j.bjorl.2022.01.008 · Cited by 3
Ear Reconstruction: Congenital, Microtia, Otoplasty
Reinisch, J. F. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-78028-9_17 · Cited by 2
Wamkpah, N. S., Newsom-Stewart, C., Kimball, A., Baratta, L. R., & Chi, J. J. (2023) · Advances in Cosmetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.yacs.2023.01.010 · Cited by 2
Management of helical adhesion malformation
Sin-Hidge, C., & Bulstrode, N. (2023) · Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2023.07.040 · Cited by 1
Self-citationCartilage-sparing otoplasty – 288 ears in 3 years
Gilron, S., Weiss, N., Kouniavski, E., Egozi, D., Dolgunin, L., & Benkler, M. (2024) · Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2024.09.031 · Cited by 1
Buchanan, E. P., & Hollier, L. H. (2019) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000005705
MODIFIED MUSTARDÉ TECHNIQUE FOR CORRECTION OF PROTRUDING EAR ( BAT EAR ) IN CHILDREN
El-Beltagy, A. E.-R. S. B., Abdallah, E.-S. H. M., Gamaan, I., & El-Kady, A. E.-R. S. Y. (2021) · Al-Azhar Medical Journal · doi:10.21608/amj.2021.196392
Shinwari, M. H., Ullah, I., & Bilal, M. (2022) · Annals of PIMS-Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University · doi:10.48036/apims.v18i1.630
Correction of Prominent Ears with Novel Otoplasty Grid
Soltani, H., Allison, S. G., Chwa, E. S., & Yamada, A. (2024) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open · doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000005803
Metadata
- Authors
- Mazeed, A. S., & Bulstrode, N. W.
- Affiliations
- Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB)
- Venue
- Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 144
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 72-80
- ISSN
- 0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2936751222
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 2.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics (clinical) › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
- Keywords
- otoplasty, prominent ears, suture extrusion, postoperative complications, deformity recurrence
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Ear Cartilage, Ear, External, Female, Humans, Male, Postoperative Complications, Recurrence, Otologic Surgical Procedures, Suture Techniques, Young Adult, Wound Closure Techniques, Organ Sparing Treatments
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review