Cited by 140

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biofilm Management in Wound Care

Sen, Chandan K., Roy, Sashwati, Mathew-Steiner, Shomita S., Gordillo, Gayle M.·2021·Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery

Abstract

Learning Objectives: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand the basics of biofilm infection and be able to distinguish between planktonic and biofilm modes of growth. 2. Have a working knowledge of conventional and emerging antibiofilm therapies and their modes of action as they pertain to wound care. 3. Understand the challenges associated with testing and marketing antibiofilm strategies and the context within which these strategies may have effective value. Summary: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimate for human infectious diseases caused by bacteria with a biofilm phenotype is 65 percent and the National Institutes of Health estimate is closer to 80 percent. Biofilms are hostile microbial aggregates because, within their polymeric matrix cocoons, they are protected from antimicrobial therapy and attack from host defenses. Biofilm-infected wounds, even when closed, show functional deficits such as deficient extracellular matrix and impaired barrier function, which are likely to cause wound recidivism. The management of invasive wound infection often includes systemic antimicrobial therapy in combination with débridement of wounds to a healthy tissue bed as determined by the surgeon who has no way of visualizing the biofilm. The exceedingly high incidence of false-negative cultures for bacteria in a biofilm state leads to missed diagnoses of wound infection. The use of topical and parenteral antimicrobial therapy without wound débridement have had limited impact on decreasing biofilm infection, which remains a major problem in wound care. Current claims to manage wound biofilm infection rest on limited early-stage data. In most cases, such data originate from limited experimental systems that lack host immune defense. In making decisions on the choice of commercial products to manage wound biofilm infection, it is important to critically appreciate the mechanism of action and significance of the relevant experimental system. In this work, the authors critically review different categories of antibiofilm products, with emphasis on their strengths and limitations as evident from the published literature.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/prs.0000000000008142

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 159

  1. Percival, 2015, Biofilms and wounds: An overview of the evidence., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 4, 373, 10.1089/wound.2014.0557 · DOI
  2. Percival, 2015, Biofilms and wounds: An identification algorithm and potential treatment options., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 4, 389, 10.1089/wound.2014.0574 · DOI
  3. Donlan, 2002, Biofilms: Microbial life on surfaces., Emerg Infect Dis, 8, 881, 10.3201/eid0809.020063 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Jefferson, 2004, What drives bacteria to produce a biofilm?, FEMS Microbiol Lett, 236, 163, 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2004.tb09643.x · DOI
  5. Costerton, 2005, Biofilm in implant infections: Its production and regulation., Int J Artif Organs, 28, 1062, 10.1177/039139880502801103 · DOI
  6. Høiby, 2011, The clinical impact of bacterial biofilms., Int J Oral Sci, 3, 55, 10.4248/IJOS11026 · DOI
  7. Hurlow, 2015, Clinical biofilms: A challenging frontier in wound care., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 4, 295, 10.1089/wound.2014.0567 · DOI
  8. Wolcott, 2011, The role of biofilms: Are we hitting the right target?, Plast Reconstr Surg, 127, 28S, 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181fca244 · DOI
  9. Cooper, 2014, Biofilms in wounds: A review of present knowledge., J Wound Care, 23, 570, 572, 10.12968/jowc.2014.23.11.570 · DOI
  10. Donlan, 2002, Biofilms: Survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms., Clin Microbiol Rev, 15, 167, 10.1128/CMR.15.2.167-193.2002 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Gonzalez, 2018, Chronic biofilm-based infections: Skewing of the immune response., Pathog Dis, 76, fty023, 10.1093/femspd/fty023 · DOI
  12. Roilides, 2015, How biofilms evade host defenses., Microbiol Spectr, 3, 10.1128/microbiolspec.MB-0012-2014 · DOI
  13. Rybtke, 2015, Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm infections: Community structure, antimicrobial tolerance and immune response., J Mol Biol, 427, 3628, 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.08.016 · DOI
  14. Watters, 2016, Host responses to biofilm., Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci, 142, 193, 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2016.05.007 · DOI
  15. Bhattacharya, 2018, Staphylococcus aureus biofilms release leukocidins to elicit extracellular trap formation and evade neutrophil-mediated killing., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 115, 7416, 10.1073/pnas.1721949115 · DOI
  16. Barki, 2019, Electric field based dressing disrupts mixed-species bacterial biofilm infection and restores functional wound healing., Ann Surg, 269, 756, 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002504 · DOI
  17. Roy, 2020, Staphylococcus aureus biofilm infection compromises wound healing by causing deficiencies in granulation tissue collagen., Ann Surg, 271, 1174, 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003053 · DOI
  18. Sen, 2016, Cutaneous imaging technologies in acute burn and chronic wound care., Plast Reconstr Surg, 138, 119S, 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002654 · DOI
  19. Altemus, 2001, Stress-induced changes in skin barrier function in healthy women., J Invest Dermatol, 117, 309, 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2001.01373.x · DOI
  20. Firooz, 2016, Daytime changes of skin biophysical characteristics: A study of hydration, transepidermal water loss, pH, sebum, elasticity, erythema, and color index on Middle Eastern skin., Indian J Dermatol, 61, 700, 10.4103/0019-5154.193707 · DOI
  21. Grice, 1975, The relationship of transepidermal water loss to skin temperature in psoriasis and eczema., J Invest Dermatol, 64, 313, 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12512258 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Grice, 1971, Skin temperature and transepidermal water loss., J Invest Dermatol, 57, 108, 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12349617 · DOI
  23. Madison, 2003, Barrier function of the skin: “La raison d’être” of the epidermis., J Invest Dermatol, 121, 231, 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12359.x · DOI
  24. Mohd Noor, 2013, Transepidermal water loss in erythrodermic patients of various aetiologies., Skin Res Technol, 19, 320, 10.1111/srt.12048 · DOI
  25. Nikam, 2019, Transepidermal water loss in psoriasis: A case-control study., Indian Dermatol Online J, 10, 267, 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_180_18 · DOI
  26. Rowe, 1981, Transepidermal water loss in the infant surgical patient., J Pediatr Surg, 16, 878, 10.1016/S0022-3468(81)80839-1 · DOI
  27. Shahidullah, 1969, Transepidermal water loss in patients with dermatitis., Br J Dermatol, 81, 722, 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1969.tb15931.x · DOI
  28. Barker, 2017, A formidable foe is sabotaging your results: What you should know about biofilms and wound healing., Plast Reconstr Surg, 139, 1184e, 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003325 · DOI
  29. Wolcott, 2008, Biofilms and chronic wound inflammation., J Wound Care, 17, 333, 10.12968/jowc.2008.17.8.30796 · DOI
  30. Arciola, 2012, Biofilm formation in Staphylococcus implant infections: A review of molecular mechanisms and implications for biofilm-resistant materials., Biomaterials, 33, 5967, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.05.031 · DOI
  31. Costerton, 2007, Bacterial communications in implant infections: A target for an intelligence war., Int J Artif Organs, 30, 757, 10.1177/039139880703000903 · DOI
  32. Dasgupta, 1989, Significance of biofilm-adherent bacterial microcolonies on Tenckhoff catheters of CAPD patients., Blood Purif, 7, 144, 10.1159/000169586 · DOI
  33. Dasgupta, 1993, Biofilm and peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis., Perit Dial Int, 13, S322, 10.1177/089686089301302S79 · DOI
  34. Ehrlich, 2005, Engineering approaches for the detection and control of orthopaedic biofilm infections., Clin Orthop Relat Res, 437, 59, 10.1097/00003086-200508000-00011 · DOI
  35. Hall-Stoodley, 2012, Towards diagnostic guidelines for biofilm-associated infections., FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol, 65, 127, 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2012.00968.x · DOI
  36. Holland, 1991, Biofilm and scleral buckle-associated infections: A mechanism for persistence., Ophthalmology, 98, 933, 10.1016/S0161-6420(91)32199-7 · DOI
  37. Kowalewska-Grochowska, 1991, Guidewire catheter change in central venous catheter biofilm formation in a burn population., Chest, 100, 1090, 10.1378/chest.100.4.1090 · DOI
  38. Marrie, 1990, Bacterial biofilm formation on nasogastric tubes., J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 5, 503, 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1990.tb01431.x · DOI
  39. Matsukawa, 2005, Bacterial colonization on intraluminal surface of urethral catheter., Urology, 65, 440, 10.1016/j.urology.2004.10.065 · DOI
  40. Nickel, 1986, Bacterial biofilm in persistent penile prosthesis-associated infection., J Urol, 135, 586, 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)45747-8 · DOI
  41. Stoodley, 2011, Orthopaedic biofilm infections., Curr Orthop Pract, 22, 558, 10.1097/BCO.0b013e318230efcf · DOI
  42. Kathju, 2010, Bacterial biofilm on monofilament suture and porcine xenograft after inguinal herniorrhaphy., FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol, 59, 405, 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00691.x · DOI
  43. Kathju, 2014, Bacterial biofilms on implanted suture material are a cause of surgical site infection., Surg Infect (Larchmt.), 15, 592, 10.1089/sur.2013.016 · DOI
  44. Kathju, 2009, Chronic surgical site infection due to suture-associated polymicrobial biofilm., Surg Infect (Larchmt.), 10, 457, 10.1089/sur.2008.062 · DOI
  45. Kathju, 2010, Cutaneous fistula from the gastric remnant resulting from a chronic suture-associated biofilm infection., Obes Surg, 20, 251, 10.1007/s11695-009-9921-8 · DOI
  46. Kathju, 2015, Direct demonstration of bacterial biofilms on prosthetic mesh after ventral herniorrhaphy., Surg Infect (Larchmt.), 16, 45, 10.1089/sur.2014.026 · DOI
  47. Bjarnsholt, 2015, Antibiofilm properties of acetic acid., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 4, 363, 10.1089/wound.2014.0554 · DOI
  48. Finnegan, 2015, EDTA: An antimicrobial and antibiofilm agent for use in wound care., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 4, 415, 10.1089/wound.2014.0577 · DOI
  49. Finnegan, 2015, Clinical and antibiofilm efficacy of antimicrobial hydrogels., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 4, 398, 10.1089/wound.2014.0556 · DOI
  50. Jones, 2015, The effect of pH on the extracellular matrix and biofilms., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 4, 431, 10.1089/wound.2014.0538 · DOI
  51. Percival, 2015, Silver and alginates: Role in wound healing and biofilm control., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 4, 407, 10.1089/wound.2014.0541 · DOI
  52. Salisbury, 2018, Efficacy of concentrated surfactant-based wound dressings in wound repair and biofilm reduction., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 7, 315, 10.1089/wound.2017.0782 · DOI
  53. Parsek, 2003, Bacterial biofilms: An emerging link to disease pathogenesis., Annu Rev Microbiol, 57, 677, 10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090720 · DOI
  54. Ganesh, 2015, Chronic wound biofilm model., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 4, 382, 10.1089/wound.2014.0587 · DOI
  55. Lebeaux, 2013, From in vitro to in vivo models of bacterial biofilm-related infections., Pathogens, 2, 288, 10.3390/pathogens2020288 · DOI
  56. Kim, 2018, Viable but non-culturable and persistence describe the same bacterial stress state., Environ Microbiol, 20, 2038, 10.1111/1462-2920.14075 · DOI
  57. Khansa, 2018, Use of antibiotic impregnated resorbable beads reduces pressure ulcer recurrence: A retrospective analysis., Wound Repair Regen, 26, 221, 10.1111/wrr.12638 · DOI
  58. Wolcott, 2009, Regular debridement is the main tool for maintaining a healthy wound bed in most chronic wounds., J Wound Care, 18, 54, 10.12968/jowc.2009.18.2.38743 · DOI
  59. Wolcott, 2010, Biofilm maturity studies indicate sharp debridement opens a time-dependent therapeutic window., J Wound Care, 19, 320, 10.12968/jowc.2010.19.8.77709 · DOI
  60. Brown, 2012, Blow fly Lucilia sericata nuclease digests DNA associated with wound slough/eschar and with Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm., Med Vet Entomol, 26, 432, 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2012.01029.x · DOI
  61. van der Plas, 2008, Maggot excretions/secretions are differentially effective against biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa., J Antimicrob Chemother, 61, 117, 10.1093/jac/dkm407 · DOI
  62. Cowan, 2013, Chronic wounds, biofilms and use of medicinal larvae., Ulcers, 2013, 1, 10.1155/2013/487024 · DOI
  63. Bohova, 2014, Selective antibiofilm effects of Lucilia sericata larvae secretions/excretions against wound pathogens., Evid Based Complement Alternat Med, 2014, 857360, 10.1155/2014/857360 · DOI
  64. Chang, 2017, Low-frequency ultrasound debridement in chronic wound healing: A systematic review of current evidence., Plast Surg (Oakv.), 25, 21, 10.1177/2292550317693813 · DOI
  65. Paliwal, 2008, Therapeutic opportunities in biological responses of ultrasound., Ultrasonics, 48, 271, 10.1016/j.ultras.2008.02.002 · DOI
  66. Lai, 2007, Physiological effects of ultrasound mist on fibroblasts., Int J Dermatol, 46, 587, 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2007.02914.x · DOI
  67. Scherba, 1991, Quantitative assessment of the germicidal efficacy of ultrasonic energy., Appl Environ Microbiol, 57, 2079, 10.1128/aem.57.7.2079-2084.1991 · DOI
  68. Stanisic, 2005, Wound debridement with 25 kHz ultrasound., Adv Skin Wound Care, 18, 484, 10.1097/00129334-200511000-00012 · DOI
  69. Suchkova, 1998, Enhancement of fibrinolysis with 40-kHz ultrasound., Circulation, 98, 1030, 10.1161/01.CIR.98.10.1030 · DOI
  70. Crone, 2015, A novel in vitro wound biofilm model used to evaluate low-frequency ultrasonic-assisted wound debridement., J Wound Care, 24, 64, 66, 10.12968/jowc.2015.24.2.64 · DOI
  71. Escandon, 2012, A prospective pilot study of ultrasound therapy effectiveness in refractory venous leg ulcers., Int Wound J, 9, 570, 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00921.x · DOI
  72. Granick, 2017, Direct-contact low-frequency ultrasound clearance of biofilm from metallic implant materials., Eplasty, 17, e13
  73. Dong, 2013, Synergy of ultrasound microbubbles and vancomycin against Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm., J Antimicrob Chemother, 68, 816, 10.1093/jac/dks490 · DOI
  74. Fu, 2019, Synergistic antibacterial effect of ultrasound microbubbles combined with chitosan-modified polymyxin B-loaded liposomes on biofilm-producing Acinetobacter baumannii., Int J Nanomedicine, 14, 1805, 10.2147/IJN.S186571 · DOI
  75. Li, 2015, Ultrasound microbubbles enhance human β-defensin 3 against biofilms., J Surg Res, 199, 458, 10.1016/j.jss.2015.05.030 · DOI
  76. Zhu, 2013, Ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction enhances human β-defensin 3 activity against antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus biofilms., Inflammation, 36, 983, 10.1007/s10753-013-9630-2 · DOI
  77. Gilmore, 2018, Cold plasmas for biofilm control: Opportunities and challenges., Trends Biotechnol, 36, 627, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.03.007 · DOI
  78. Mai-Prochnow, 2014, Atmospheric pressure plasmas: Infection control and bacterial responses., Int J Antimicrob Agents, 43, 508, 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2014.01.025 · DOI
  79. Ziuzina, 2015, Cold plasma inactivation of bacterial biofilms and reduction of quorum sensing regulated virulence factors., PLoS One, 10, e0138209, 10.1371/journal.pone.0138209 · DOI
  80. Hu, 2018, Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy to control clinically relevant biofilm infections., Front Microbiol, 9, 1299, 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01299 · DOI
  81. Wang, 2016, Antimicrobial blue light inactivation of Gram-negative pathogens in biofilms: In vitro and in vivo studies., J Infect Dis, 213, 1380, 10.1093/infdis/jiw070 · DOI
  82. de Freitas, 2017, Effect of photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy on mono- and multi-species cariogenic biofilms: A literature review., Photomed Laser Surg, 35, 239, 10.1089/pho.2016.4108 · DOI
  83. Mamone, 2016, Photodynamic inactivation of planktonic and biofilm growing bacteria mediated by a meso-substituted porphyrin bearing four basic amino groups., J Photochem Photobiol B, 161, 222, 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.05.026 · DOI
  84. Dovigo, 2011, Investigation of the photodynamic effects of curcumin against Candida albicans., Photochem Photobiol, 87, 895, 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2011.00937.x · DOI
  85. Bliss, 2004, Susceptibility of Candida species to photodynamic effects of photofrin., Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 48, 2000, 10.1128/AAC.48.6.2000-2006.2004 · DOI
  86. Kashef, 2013, Effect of sub-lethal photodynamic inactivation on the antibiotic susceptibility and biofilm formation of clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates., Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 10, 368, 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2013.02.005 · DOI
  87. Kim, 2016, Nanoparticle-based therapies for wound biofilm infection: Opportunities and challenges., IEEE Trans Nanobioscience, 15, 294, 10.1109/TNB.2016.2527600 · DOI
  88. Leaper, 2012, Appropriate use of silver dressings in wounds: International consensus document., Int Wound J, 9, 461, 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01091.x · DOI
  89. Chen, 2008, Nanosilver: A nanoproduct in medical application., Toxicol Lett, 176, 1, 10.1016/j.toxlet.2007.10.004 · DOI
  90. Bowler, 2016, Combatting wound biofilm and recalcitrance with a novel anti-biofilm Hydrofiber wound dressing., Wound Med, 14, 6, 10.1016/j.wndm.2016.05.005 · DOI
  91. Phillips, 2015, Antimicrobial dressing efficacy against mature Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm on porcine skin explants., Int Wound J, 12, 469, 10.1111/iwj.12142 · DOI
  92. Davis, 2019, Preclinical evaluation of a novel silver gelling fiber dressing on Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a porcine wound infection model., Wound Repair Regen, 27, 360, 10.1111/wrr.12718 · DOI
  93. Rai, 2009, Silver nanoparticles as a new generation of antimicrobials., Biotechnol Adv, 27, 76, 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.09.002 · DOI
  94. Roe, 2008, Antimicrobial surface functionalization of plastic catheters by silver nanoparticles., J Antimicrob Chemother, 61, 869, 10.1093/jac/dkn034 · DOI
  95. Lee, 2016, Fabrication of a silver particle-integrated silicone polymer-covered metal stent against sludge and biofilm formation and stent-induced tissue inflammation., Sci Rep, 6, 35446, 10.1038/srep35446 · DOI
  96. Wang, 2015, Antifouling coating with controllable and sustained silver release for long-term inhibition of infection and encrustation in urinary catheters., J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 103, 519, 10.1002/jbm.b.33230 · DOI
  97. Wen, 2016, Silver-nanoparticle-coated biliary stent inhibits bacterial adhesion in bacterial cholangitis in swine., Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 15, 87, 10.1016/S1499-3872(15)60410-6 · DOI
  98. Mohanty, 2012, An investigation on the antibacterial, cytotoxic, and antibiofilm efficacy of starch-stabilized silver nanoparticles., Nanomedicine, 8, 916, 10.1016/j.nano.2011.11.007 · DOI
  99. Stevens, 2009, The relationship between the antimicrobial effect of catheter coatings containing silver nanoparticles and the coagulation of contacting blood., Biomaterials, 30, 3682, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.03.054 · DOI
  100. Fitzgerald, 2017, Cadexomer iodine provides superior efficacy against bacterial wound biofilms in vitro and in vivo., Wound Repair Regen, 25, 13, 10.1111/wrr.12497 · DOI
  101. Akiyama, 2004, Assessment of cadexomer iodine against Staphylococcus aureus biofilm in vivo and in vitro using confocal laser scanning microscopy., J Dermatol, 31, 529, 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2004.tb00549.x · DOI
  102. Malone, 2017, Effect of cadexomer iodine on the microbial load and diversity of chronic non-healing diabetic foot ulcers complicated by biofilm in vivo., J Antimicrob Chemother, 72, 2093, 10.1093/jac/dkx099 · DOI
  103. Roche, 2019, Cadexomer iodine effectively reduces bacterial biofilm in porcine wounds ex vivo and in vivo., Int Wound J, 16, 674, 10.1111/iwj.13080 · DOI
  104. Robson, 2007, Hypochlorous acid as a potential wound care agent: Part II. Stabilized hypochlorous acid. Its role in decreasing tissue bacterial bioburden and overcoming the inhibition of infection on wound healing., J Burns Wounds, 6, e6
  105. Sakarya, 2014, Hypochlorous acid: An ideal wound care agent with powerful microbicidal, antibiofilm, and wound healing potency., Wounds, 26, 342
  106. Rani, 2014, The in vitro antimicrobial activity of wound and skin cleansers at nontoxic concentrations., Adv Skin Wound Care, 27, 65, 10.1097/01.ASW.0000443255.73875.a3 · DOI
  107. Romanowski, 2018, In vitro evaluation of a hypochlorous acid hygiene solution on established biofilms., Eye Contact Lens, 442, S187, 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000456 · DOI
  108. Day, 2017, Disruption of biofilms and neutralization of bacteria using hypochlorous acid solution: An in vivo and in vitro evaluation., Adv Skin Wound Care, 30, 543, 10.1097/01.ASW.0000526607.80113.66 · DOI
  109. Papenfort, 2016, Quorum sensing signal-response systems in Gram-negative bacteria., Nat Rev Microbiol, 14, 576, 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.89 · DOI · Paper page
  110. Heilmann, 2015, Why do bacteria regulate public goods by quorum sensing? How the shapes of cost and benefit functions determine the form of optimal regulation., Front Microbiol, 6, 767, 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00767 · DOI
  111. Lee, 2011, Low concentrations of honey reduce biofilm formation, quorum sensing, and virulence in Escherichia coli O157:H7., Biofouling, 27, 1095, 10.1080/08927014.2011.633704 · DOI
  112. Truchado, 2009, Inhibition by chestnut honey of N-Acyl-L-homoserine lactones and biofilm formation in Erwinia carotovora, Yersinia enterocolitica, and Aeromonas hydrophila., J Agric Food Chem, 57, 11186, 10.1021/jf9029139 · DOI
  113. He, 2012, Use of the quorum sensing inhibitor furanone C-30 to interfere with biofilm formation by Streptococcus mutans and its luxS mutant strain., Int J Antimicrob Agents, 40, 30, 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.03.016 · DOI
  114. Hentzer, 2002, Inhibition of quorum sensing in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm bacteria by a halogenated furanone compound., Microbiology (Reading), 148, 87, 10.1099/00221287-148-1-87 · DOI
  115. Yang, 2014, Bicyclic brominated furanones: A new class of quorum sensing modulators that inhibit bacterial biofilm formation., Bioorg Med Chem, 22, 1313, 10.1016/j.bmc.2014.01.004 · DOI
  116. Rémy, 2018, Interference in bacterial quorum sensing: A biopharmaceutical perspective., Front Pharmacol, 9, 203, 10.3389/fphar.2018.00203 · DOI
  117. Hannan, 2018, In vitro Salmonella typhi biofilm formation on gallstones and its disruption by Manuka honey., Pak J Pharm Sci, 31, 129
  118. Maddocks, 2013, Manuka honey inhibits adhesion and invasion of medically important wound bacteria in vitro., Future Microbiol, 8, 1523, 10.2217/fmb.13.126 · DOI
  119. Maddocks, 2012, Manuka honey inhibits the development of Streptococcus pyogenes biofilms and causes reduced expression of two fibronectin binding proteins., Microbiology (Reading), 158, 781, 10.1099/mic.0.053959-0 · DOI
  120. Majtan, 2014, Anti-biofilm effects of honey against wound pathogens Proteus mirabilis and Enterobacter cloacae., Phytother Res, 28, 69, 10.1002/ptr.4957 · DOI
  121. Piotrowski, 2017, Antimicrobial effects of Manuka honey on in vitro biofilm formation by Clostridium difficile., Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 36, 1661, 10.1007/s10096-017-2980-1 · DOI
  122. Liu, 2014, Antibiotic-specific differences in the response of Staphylococcus aureus to treatment with antimicrobials combined with manuka honey., Front Microbiol, 5, 779
  123. Liu, 2017, Rifampicin-manuka honey combinations are superior to other antibiotic-manuka honey combinations in eradicating Staphylococcus aureus biofilms., Front Microbiol, 8, 2653, 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02653 · DOI
  124. Campeau, 2014, Antibiofilm activity of manuka honey in combination with antibiotics., Int J Bacteriol, 2014, 795281, 10.1155/2014/795281 · DOI
  125. Camplin, 2014, Manuka honey treatment of biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa results in the emergence of isolates with increased honey resistance., Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob, 13, 19, 10.1186/1476-0711-13-19 · DOI
  126. Carter, 2016, Therapeutic manuka honey: No longer so alternative., Front Microbiol, 7, 569, 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00569 · DOI
  127. Johnston, 2018, Antibacterial activity of manuka honey and its components: An overview., AIMS Microbiol, 4, 655, 10.3934/microbiol.2018.4.655 · DOI
  128. Kamaratos, 2014, Manuka honey-impregnated dressings in the treatment of neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers., Int Wound J, 11, 259, 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.01082.x · DOI
  129. Molan, 2015, Honey: A biologic wound dressing., Wounds, 27, 141
  130. White, 2016, Manuka honey in wound management: Greater than the sum of its parts?, J Wound Care, 25, 539, 10.12968/jowc.2016.25.9.539 · DOI
  131. Paramasivan, 2014, Methylglyoxal-augmented manuka honey as a topical anti-Staphylococcus aureus biofilm agent: Safety and efficacy in an in vivo model., Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 4, 187, 10.1002/alr.21264 · DOI
  132. Qamar, 2018, In vitro and in vivo activity of manuka honey against NDM-1-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae ST11., Future Microbiol, 13, 13, 10.2217/fmb-2017-0119 · DOI
  133. Ashrafi, 2016, The efficacy of electrical stimulation in experimentally induced cutaneous wounds in animals., Vet Dermatol, 27, 235, 10.1111/vde.12328 · DOI
  134. Ashrafi, 2017, The efficacy of electrical stimulation in lower extremity cutaneous wound healing: A systematic review., Exp Dermatol, 26, 171, 10.1111/exd.13179 · DOI
  135. Devine, 1998, Electric stimulation and wound healing., J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 25, 291
  136. Hunckler, 2017, A current affair: Electrotherapy in wound healing., J Multidiscip Healthc, 10, 179, 10.2147/JMDH.S127207 · DOI
  137. Kloth, 2014, Electrical stimulation technologies for wound healing., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 3, 81, 10.1089/wound.2013.0459 · DOI
  138. Reid, 2014, The electrical response to injury: Molecular mechanisms and wound healing., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 3, 184, 10.1089/wound.2013.0442 · DOI
  139. Thakral, 2013, Electrical stimulation to accelerate wound healing., Diabet Foot Ankle, 4, 10.3402/dfa.v4i0.22081 · DOI
  140. Torkaman, 2014, Electrical stimulation of wound healing: A review of animal experimental evidence., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 3, 202, 10.1089/wound.2012.0409 · DOI
  141. Ud-Din, 2014, Electrical stimulation and cutaneous wound healing: A review of clinical evidence., Healthcare (Basel), 2, 445, 10.3390/healthcare2040445 · DOI
  142. Banerjee, 2015, Silver-zinc redox-coupled electroceutical wound dressing disrupts bacterial biofilm., PLoS One, 10, e0119531, 10.1371/journal.pone.0119531 · DOI
  143. Banerjee, 2014, Improvement of human keratinocyte migration by a redox active bioelectric dressing., PLoS One, 9, e89239, 10.1371/journal.pone.0089239 · DOI
  144. Ghatak, 2015, A wireless electroceutical dressing lowers cost of negative pressure wound therapy., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 4, 302, 10.1089/wound.2014.0615 · DOI
  145. Kim, 2014, Antibacterial efficacy testing of a bioelectric wound dressing against clinical wound pathogens., Open Microbiol J, 8, 15, 10.2174/1874285801408010015 · DOI
  146. Kim, 2016, An overview of the efficacy of a next generation electroceutical wound care device., Mil Med, 181, 184, 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00157 · DOI
  147. Roy, 2019, Disposable patterned electroceutical dressing (PED-10) is safe for treatment of open clinical chronic wounds., Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle), 8, 149, 10.1089/wound.2018.0915 · DOI
  148. Dusane, 2019, Electroceutical treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms., Sci Rep, 9, 2008, 10.1038/s41598-018-37891-y · DOI
  149. Sultana, 2015, Electrochemical scaffold generates localized, low concentration of hydrogen peroxide that inhibits bacterial pathogens and biofilms., Sci Rep, 5, 14908, 10.1038/srep14908 · DOI
  150. Sultana, 2016, Maltodextrin enhances biofilm elimination by electrochemical scaffold., Sci Rep, 6, 36003, 10.1038/srep36003 · DOI
  151. Burrowes, 2011, Bacteriophage therapy: Potential uses in the control of antibiotic-resistant pathogens., Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther, 9, 775, 10.1586/eri.11.90 · DOI
  152. Shlezinger, 2017, Phage therapy: A new horizon in the antibacterial treatment of oral pathogens., Curr Top Med Chem, 17, 1199, 10.2174/1568026616666160930145649 · DOI
  153. Bollyky, 2019, The innate sense of bacteriophages., Cell Host Microbe, 25, 177, 10.1016/j.chom.2019.01.020 · DOI
  154. Secor, 2016, Filamentous bacteriophage produced by Pseudomonas aeruginosa alters the inflammatory response and promotes noninvasive infection in vivo., Infect Immun, 85, e00648
  155. Sweere, 2019, Bacteriophage trigger antiviral immunity and prevent clearance of bacterial infection., Science, 363, eaat9691, 10.1126/science.aat9691 · DOI
  156. Pires, 2017, Phage therapy as an alternative or complementary strategy to prevent and control biofilm-related infections., Curr Opin Microbiol, 39, 48, 10.1016/j.mib.2017.09.004 · DOI
  157. Packer, 2017, Phage-assisted continuous evolution of proteases with altered substrate specificity., Nat Commun, 8, 956, 10.1038/s41467-017-01055-9 · DOI
  158. Santos, 2018, Exploiting bacteriophage proteomes: The hidden biotechnological potential., Trends Biotechnol, 36, 966, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.04.006 · DOI
  159. Young, 2014, Phage lysis: Three steps, three choices, one outcome., J Microbiol, 52, 243, 10.1007/s12275-014-4087-z · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 140

Metadata

Authors
Sen, C. K., Roy, S., Mathew-Steiner, S. S., & Gordillo, G. M.
Venue
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2021-07-27
Volume
148
Issue
2
Pages
275e-288e
ISSN
0032-1052
Cited by
140
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review