Cited by 196Craniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsPectus Deformity Diagnosis and TreatmentReconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques

Single Sutural Craniosynostoses: Surgical Outcomes and Long-Term Growth

Fearon, Jeffrey A., Ruotolo, Rachel A., Kolar, John C.·2009·Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to examine long-term skull growth following single sutural synostosis corrections and to evaluate surgical outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective outcome assessment of all children treated with a single-stage, open-remodeling procedure for sagittal, metopic, unilateral coronal, and unilateral lambdoid synostosis was performed. Long-term growth was assessed from serial anthropometric measurements taken up to 11 years postoperatively (mean, 4 years). RESULTS: Of 296 consecutive patients, complete records were available for 248 operative procedures. The mean surgical age was 12.3 months (range, 2.5 months to 8 years), with 36 patients older than 12 months. Transfusion rates decreased from 81 to 19 percent following the institution of blood conservation strategies. The average hospitalization was 2.5 days. There was one nonsurgically treated infection (0.4 percent), and no major complications or deaths. Five patients underwent secondary remodeling procedures (2 percent). Serial anthropometric measurements, obtained in 75 patients, showed normalization of cranial indices 6 weeks postoperatively, but subsequent measurements revealed statistically significant diminished growth. Earlier surgical treatment of metopic synostosis (4 months) was associated with significantly more growth inhibition than seen in those treated at an older age (12 months), with the other synostoses showing similar tendencies. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of single sutural synostosis was extremely safe with very low reoperative rates, but subsequent calvarial growth was abnormal, with a tendency toward recapitulation of the primary deformity. Growth was less diminished in procedures performed in older infants. Surgeons treating single sutural craniosynostosis should consider expanding treatment goals beyond normalization to an overcorrection of the abnormal skull shape.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/prs.0b013e318195661a

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fearon, J. A., Ruotolo, R. A., & Kolar, J. C.
Affiliations
Medical City Children's Hospital (US)
Venue
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2009-02
Volume
123
Issue
2
Pages
635-642
ISSN
0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051735618
Cited by
196
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 17
FWCI
6.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
Keywords
sagittal synostosis, metopic synostosis, coronal synostosis, lambdoid synostosis, cranial index, timing of surgery, blood conservation, surgical outcomes, overcorrection
MeSH terms
Cephalometry, Child, Child, Preschool, Cranial Sutures, Craniosynostoses, Follow-Up Studies, Head, Humans, Infant, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Plastic Surgery Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review