Cited by 146Craniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsPectus Deformity Diagnosis and TreatmentReconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques

Sagittal craniosynostosis: Surgical outcomes and long-term growth

Fearon, Jeffrey A., McLaughlin, Emily B., Kolar, John C.·2006·Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Numerous publications have examined technique-specific results in treating sagittal synostosis, but there are scant data examining long-term outcomes. This retrospective study was designed to evaluate a large series of surgically repaired children with sagittal craniosynostosis and to examine long-term cranial growth following correction. METHODS: From 1990 to 2003, 132 children with sagittal synostosis were evaluated and 89 surgically treated (single-stage posterior remodeling) patients were retrospectively reviewed (43 were excluded for multisutural involvement, incomplete records, or nonsurgical treatment). Long-term growth was assessed from anthropologic measurements taken from 3 to 11 years postoperatively (mean, 4.7 years). RESULTS: The surgical age ranged from 2 months to 5 years (mean, 8 months), and the hospital stay was less than 3 days. There were no deaths, major complications, infections, or repeated remodeling procedures performed. Postoperatively, the cephalic index was overcorrected. Subsequent growth of the cranial breadth and length was less than predicted. Moreover, growth was more deficient in cranial breadth than length, resulting in a regression of the cephalic index over time (p < 0.01). Frontal breadth improved immediately postoperatively but did not subsequently narrow over time. Head circumference also showed a statistically significant diminished capacity for growth (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated abnormal skull growth in children following the surgical correction of scaphocephaly. On the basis of these findings, surgeons treating sagittal synostosis may wish to expand their goals of treatment beyond normalization to an overcorrection of the abnormal skull shape.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.prs.0000200774.31311.09

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Endoscopic procedures have the advantage of requiring fewer skin incisions and less blood loss and are considered less invasive and more child-friendly.

    “They have the advantage of requiring fewer skin incisions and less blood loss and are therefore considered less invasive and more child-friendly [64,65,66,67,68,69,70].”

    From Isolated Sagittal Craniosynostosis: A Comprehensive Review (2024) · cites this paper as [64]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fearon, J. A., McLaughlin, E. B., & Kolar, J. C.
Affiliations
Medical City Dallas Hospital (US)
Venue
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2006-02
Volume
117
Issue
2
Pages
532-541
ISSN
0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2085657752
Cited by
146
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pectus Deformity Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
Keywords
sagittal craniosynostosis, scaphocephaly, cephalic index, cranial breadth, cranial length, head circumference, overcorrection
MeSH terms
Child, Preschool, Craniosynostoses, Craniotomy, Humans, Infant, Length of Stay, Osteotomy, Postoperative Period, Retrospective Studies, Skull, Treatment Outcome, Plastic Surgery Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review