Cited by 29Patient Safety and Medication ErrorsSocial Media in Health EducationInnovations in Medical Education

Check a Box. Save a Life: How Student Leadership Is Shaking Up Health Care and Driving a Revolution in Patient Safety

Henderson, Daniel, Carson-Stevens, Andrew, Bohnen, Jordan, Gutnik, Lily, Hafiz, Shabnam, Mills, Shannon·2010·Journal of Patient Safety

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to engage health professions students as leaders in spreading the World Health Organization Surgical Checklist. The published impact of the checklist in reducing surgical complications and deaths, combined with its ease of use, offers an ideal target for students to save lives and prevent suffering. As members of the "Check a Box. Save a Life." campaign, students can speed the pace of patient safety improvement. METHODS: The campaign was developed around an online Webcast event, designated its launch. Outreach was conducted mainly through social media, especially the popular networking Web site, Facebook. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Open School for Health Professions and the American Medical Student Association provided a source of potential campaign members. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-two registrants, representing 122 distinct hosting institutions, signed up for the launch event. Based on hosts' projected event sizes, assessed in a registration questionnaire, approximately 1400 students are believed to have participated in the event. After the launch, these students joined the campaign and were invited to carry out projects in their home institutions. Six weeks after the launch, the campaign reconvened at the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's 21st Annual National Forum, and attendees presented case reports of 15 projects they had undertaken since the launch. CONCLUSIONS: As an independent, self-organized, decentralized effort and an application of student social organizing to the cause of patient safety, "Check a Box." is a landmark achievement. Leveraging social media and disrupting the traditional model of safety leadership, the campaign offers hope for the future of patient safety.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/pts.0b013e3181d23411

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Henderson, D., Carson-Stevens, A., Bohnen, J., Gutnik, L., Hafiz, S., & Mills, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
  • American Medical Student Association (US)
Corresponding author
  • Henderson, Daniel
  • Hafiz, Shabnam
Venue
Journal of Patient Safety
Published
2010-03
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
43-47
ISSN
1549-8417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020104647
Cited by
29
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Patient Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  • Harvard Kennedy School
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
surgical safety checklist, patient safety, health professions students, social media outreach, Facebook, surgical complications, patient safety leadership
MeSH terms
Humans, Leadership, Students, Medical, General Surgery, Safety Management, Medical Errors, Checklist

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review