The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The prevalence and incidence of neurocognitive impairment in the HAART era
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: HAART suppresses HIV viral replication and restores immune function. The effects of HAART on neurological disease are less well understood. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and incidence of neurocognitive impairment in individuals who initiated HAART as part of an AIDS clinical trial. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study of HIV-positive patients enrolled in randomized antiretroviral trials, the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) Longitudinal Linked Randomized Trials (ALLRT) study. METHODS: We examined the association between baseline and demographic characteristics and neurocognitive impairment among 1160 subjects enrolled in the ALLRT study. RESULTS: A history of immunosuppression (nadir CD4 cell count < 200 cells/microl) was associated with an increase in prevalent neurocognitive impairment. There were no significant virological and immunological predictors of incident neurocognitive impairment. Current immune status (low CD4 cell count) was associated with sustained prevalent impairment. CONCLUSION: The association of previous advanced immunosuppression with prevalent and sustained impairment suggests that there is a non-reversible component of neural injury that tracks with a history of disease progression. The association of sustained impairment with worse current immune status (low CD4 cell count) suggests that restoring immunocompetence increases the likelihood of neurocognitive recovery. Finally, the lack of association between incident neurocognitive impairment and virological and immunological indicators implies that neural injury continues in some patients regardless of the success of antiretroviral therapy on these laboratory measures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
HIV Infection, Inflammation, Immunosenescence, and Aging
Deeks, S. G. (2011) · Annual Review of Medicine · doi:10.1146/annurev-med-042909-093756 · Cited by 1,349
Ancuta, P., Kamat, A., Kunstman, K. J., Kim, E.-Y., Autissier, P., Wurcel, A., Zaman, T., Stone, D., Mefford, M., Morgello, S., et al. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002516 · Cited by 499
The Mind Exchange Working Group, Antinori, A., Arendt, G., Grant, I., Letendre, S., Chair, Munoz-Moreno, J. A., Eggers, C., Brew, B., Brouillette, M.-J., et al. (2013) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/cis975 · Cited by 208
Self-citationBorjabad, A., Morgello, S., Chao, W., Kim, S.-Y., Brooks, A. I., Murray, J., Potash, M. J., & Volsky, D. J. (2011) · PLoS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002213 · Cited by 111
Randomized trial of minocycline in the treatment of HIV-associated cognitive impairment
Nakasujja, N., Miyahara, S., Evans, S., Lee, A., Musisi, S., Katabira, E., Robertson, K., Ronald, A., Clifford, D. B., & Sacktor, N. (2013) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e31827b9121 · Cited by 67
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Robertson, K. R., Smurzynski, M., Parsons, T. D., Wu, K., Bosch, R. J., Wu, J., McArthur, J. C., Collier, A. C., Evans, S. R., & Ellis, R. J.
- Venue
- AIDS
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1915-1921
- ISSN
- 0269-9370 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162166621
- Cited by
- 619
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The prevalence and incidence of neurocognitive impairment in the HAART era. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/qad.0b013e32828e4e27
- The paper
- Robertson, K. R., Smurzynski, M., Parsons, T. D., Wu, K., Bosch, R. J., Wu, J., McArthur, J. C., Collier, A. C., Evans, S. R., & Ellis, R. J. (2007). The prevalence and incidence of neurocognitive impairment in the HAART era. AIDS. https://doi.org/10.1097/qad.0b013e32828e4e27
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.