Cited by 199HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

A comparison of sexual behavior patterns among men who have sex with men and heterosexual men and women.

Open access
Glick, Sara Nelson, Morris, Martina, Foxman, Betsy, Aral, Sevgi O., Manhart, Lisa E., Holmes, King K., Golden, Matthew R.·2012·JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Men who have sex with men (MSM) have higher rates of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections than women and heterosexual men. This elevated risk persists across age groups and reflects biological and behavioral factors; yet, there have been few direct comparisons of sexual behavior patterns between these populations. METHODS: We compared sexual behavior patterns of MSM and male and female heterosexuals aged 18-39 using 4 population-based random digit dialing surveys. A 1996-1998 survey in 4 US cities and 2 Seattle surveys (2003 and 2006) provided estimates for MSM; a 2003-2004 Seattle survey provided data about heterosexual men and women. RESULTS: Sexual debut occurred earlier among MSM than heterosexuals. MSM reported longer cumulative lifetime periods of new partner acquisition than heterosexuals and a more gradual decline in new partnership formation with age. Among MSM, 86% of 18- to 24-year-olds and 72% of 35- to 39-year-olds formed a new partnership during the previous year, compared with 56% of heterosexual men and 34% of women at 18-24 years, and 21% and 10%, respectively, at 35-39 years. MSM were also more likely to choose partners >5 years older and were 2-3 times as likely as heterosexuals to report recent concurrent partnerships. MSM reported more consistent condom use during anal sex than heterosexuals reported during vaginal sex. CONCLUSIONS: MSM have longer periods of partnership acquisition, a higher prevalence of partnership concurrency, and more age disassortative mixing than heterosexuals. These factors likely help to explain higher HIV/sexually transmitted infections rates among MSM, despite higher levels of condom use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/qai.0b013e318247925e

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These factors, along with sexual network or higher community disease prevalence, can increase the risk for STIs among MSM compared with other groups.

    “These factors, along with sexual network or higher community disease prevalence, can increase the risk for STIs among MSM compared with other groups (183,184).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [183]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says MSM’s sexual-network patterns may help explain their higher HIV/STI rates and that network connectivity may enable more efficient transmission. The Introduction documents higher HIV and syphilis rates among MSM, but our copy does not identify higher community disease prevalence itself as a cause of increased STI risk. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [4]Purcell DW Johnson C Lansky A Prejean J Stein R Denning P Calculating disease rates for risk groups: estimating the national population size of men who have sex with men (abstract) Paper presented at: National STD Prevention Conference 2010 Atlanta, Georgia

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glick, S. N., Morris, M., Foxman, B., Aral, S. O., Manhart, L. E., Holmes, K. K., & Golden, M. R.
Affiliations
  • George Washington University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
  • Glick, Sara Nelson
  • Holmes, King K.
  • Golden, Matthew R.
Venue
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
Published
2012-05-01
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
83-90
ISSN
1525-4135 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091964860
Cited by
199
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH054320)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (K23AI001846, T32AI007140)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD042828)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Keywords
men who have sex with men, heterosexuals, sexual behavior patterns, sexual initiation, condom use, anal sex, HIV risk, sexually transmitted infections, young adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Risk Factors, Sexual Behavior, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, United States, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review