Cited by 34HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models

Sexual networks and infection transmission networks among men who have sex with men as causes of disparity and targets of prevention.

Open access
Spicknall, Ian H, Gift, Thomas L, Bernstein, Kyle T, Aral, Sevgi O·2017·Sexually Transmitted Infections

Abstract

HIV and other STIs spread via people's sexual connections across time and space. Transmission speed and trajectory through a population may be hastened or hindered by features of the underlying sexual network itself and the individuals who compose the network. Men who have sex with men (MSM) are disproportionately affected by STI.1 ,2 This disparity may be partly explained by three related concepts: (1) MSM networks are composed of individuals with higher behavioural risks (composition effects); (2) MSM network geometry predisposes MSM networks to higher levels of infection (network geometry) and (3) MSM demographic mixing patterns facilitate STI spread between groups (network topology). Here, we describe these three unique aspects of MSM networks and examine MSM sexual networks through a lens focused on two modern aspects of sexual partner recruitment—meeting partners during travel and through the internet and cellphone-based applications. MSM may have worse network-level infection outcomes (ie, endemic prevalence, probability of epidemic takeoff) simply because MSM networks are composed of individuals with riskier individual-level risk factors. While numerous studies have described MSM sexual risk behaviour in isolation, the literature making direct comparisons of behaviour between MSM and exclusively heterosexual men is more limited. In two population-based surveys making this direct comparison, MSM had more recent sexual partners,2 ,3 more concurrent sexual partnerships2 and more condomless sex with two or more partners in the past year2 than heterosexual men. Network transitivity relates to the proportion of closed triadic loops in a given network—in other words, how often are an individual's sex partners also sex partners with each other, thus forming a closed loop.4 This arrangement is impossible in exclusively …

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/sextrans-2016-052676

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MSM might be at increased risk for HIV and other STIs because of their sexual network or behavioral or biologic factors, including number of concurrent partners, condomless sex, anal sex, or substance use.

    “MSM might be at increased risk for HIV and other STIs because of their sexual network or behavioral or biologic factors, including number of concurrent partners, condomless sex, anal sex, or substance use (180–182).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [182]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [4]Newman M. Networks: an introduction. Oxford University Press, 2010.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spicknall, I. H., Gift, T. L., Bernstein, K. T., & Aral, S. O.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Spicknall, Ian H
Venue
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2017-04-07
Volume
93
Issue
5
Pages
307-308
ISSN
  • 0007-134X (ISSN-L)
  • 1368-4973
  • 1472-3263
OpenAlex
W2604291523
Cited by
34
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sexually Transmitted Infections (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Keywords
men who have sex with men, sexual networks, HIV transmission, network topology, network geometry, network transitivity, sexual risk behavior, concurrent sexual partnerships, unprotected sex, dating apps, health disparities
MeSH terms
Sexual and Gender Minorities, Adult, Humans, Male, Sexual Partners, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Social Environment, HIV Infections, Homosexuality, Male, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review