Cited by 21Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthSexual function and dysfunction studiesMarriage and Sexual Relationships

Prevalence and types of sexual inactivity in Britain: analyses of national cross-sectional probability survey data

Open access
Ueda, Peter, Mercer, Catherine H·2019·BMJ Open

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine how prevalence and context of sexual inactivity varies across the life-course, assess dissatisfaction with sex life among those who are sexually inactive and identify associations with factors that may represent reasons for sexual inactivity. DESIGN: Analysis of cross-sectional probability sample survey data. SETTING: British general population. PARTICIPANTS: 14 623 participants (n men: 6045 unweighted, 7245 weighted), aged 16-74 years, of the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3), undertaken in 2010-2012. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sexual inactivity, defined as not reporting oral, vaginal or anal intercourse in the past year and further categorised into those who were sexually inexperienced (had never had sex), single or in a relationship. RESULTS: Overall, 15.9% (weighted n 1155/7245) of men and 22.2% (1646/7410) of women were sexually inactive (p<0.001). The proportion of sexually inactive individuals who were sexually inexperienced was larger among men than women (26.3% (304/1155) vs 16.3% (268/1646)), while the proportion who were singles was larger among women (49.8% (820/1646) vs 40.4% (467/1155)). Sexual inexperience was the most common type of sexual inactivity in early adulthood, with this declining with age. A minority of those who had sexual experience but were sexually inactive-34.8% (293/842) of men and 23.6% (319/1349) of women-reported being dissatisfied with their sex lives. Associations with sexual inactivity was observed for a range of sociodemographics and sexual behaviours/attitudes, for example, religion, ethnicity, Body mass index, height, employment status and index of multiple deprivation; these associations varied by type of sexual inactivity and gender. CONCLUSIONS: While sex is important for well-being, a non-negligible proportion of the population at all ages are sexually inactive, yet many are not dissatisfied with their situation, with implications for sex and relationship counselling.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030708

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The extremes of sexual activity categories (sexual inactivity, weekly sex or more, no sexual partners, and 3 or more sexual partners) have been used in previous studies.

    “We focused on these measures of sexual activity because they constitute the extremes of the categories used in our analyses and have been used in previous studies.12,14,20”

    From Trends in Frequency of Sexual Activity and Number of Sexual Partners Among Adults Aged 18 to 44 Years in the US, 2000-2018 (2020) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Methods section defines sexual inactivity as no partnered vaginal, anal or oral sex in the past year, and the paper also discusses having no sexual partners in the past year. It does not establish that weekly sex or more or three or more sexual partners were categories used in this study. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [21]The American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard definitions: final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. 7th edition, 2011 AAPOR.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ueda, P., & Mercer, C. H.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Ueda, Peter
Venue
BMJ Open
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2019-10
Volume
9
Issue
10
Pages
e030708
ISSN
2044-6055 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2982293307
Cited by
21
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Open (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (084840)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
Keywords
sexual inactivity, sexual inexperience, sexual dissatisfaction, life course, gender differences, single people, sociodemographic factors, ethnicity, body mass index, employment status, Index of Multiple Deprivation, Natsal-3
MeSH terms
Sexual Health, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Attitude, Avoidance Learning, Body Height, Educational Status, Employment, Ethnicity, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Religion and Sex, Sexual Behavior, Sex Factors, Sexual Abstinence, Social Class, Body Mass Index, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review