Cited by 8Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesCongenital Ear and Nasal AnomaliesNasal Surgery and Airway Studies

A Modification of the Posterior Perichondrio-Adipo-Dermal Flap for Protruding Ear Correction: A Customized Technique

Ersen, Burak·2019·Annals of Plastic Surgery

Abstract

Prominent ear deformity is a common congenital deformity of the external ear affecting 5% of the general population. Because of the deformity's displeasing nature, corrective prominent ear surgery is widely common and performed as a prophylactic surgery. More than 200 surgical techniques for the correction of prominent ear deformity have been described to improve the cosmetic outcome and decrease complication rates. The aim of the study was to present a modified post auricular flap technique that increases the control of reshaping the ear cartilages, decreases the operation time, and provides a symmetrical long-lasting cosmetic outcome.One hundred sixty-two patients (141 male and 21 female) had ear correction surgeries performed by the same surgeon using the described technique between January 2015 and January 2018. One hundred sixty patients were gone through bilateral ear correction, whereas only 2 patients had unilateral ear correction procedures. A modified posterior perichondrio-adipo-dermal flap technique for protruding ear correction was applied to all patients.The patients' ages ranged from 18 to 40 years, with a median of 28.3 years. The mean follow-up time was 22.5 months (6-36 months). Total operation time was 35 minutes on average (25-45 minutes). As more experience was gained in flap harvesting, operation time became shorter. The mean preoperative upper third ear proportion-scalp distance was 33.1 mm and the middle third ear proportion-scalp distance was 29.8 mm. At the sixth month of the surgery, the measurements were 9.8 and 11.6 mm.Measuring and adjusting flap's width provided to achieve symmetry in initial technique. Locating the postoperative scar along the posterior surface of the helical groove also provides a natural view. Different from traditional posterior fascial flap, the width of the flap was narrowed to 8 to 10 mm. In the traditional technique, the flap was dissected along the incision margins. Narrowing the width of the flap decreased the operation time. The preserved skin between the helix and the mastoid bone has the same width with perichondrio-adipo-dermal flap. That increases the control over the helix-mastoid distance and posterior auricular fold not to mention provides permanent results. The previously mentioned method can be a simple, useful, and practical technique for protruding ear deformity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/sap.0000000000002025

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ersen, B.
Corresponding author
Ersen, Burak
Venue
Annals of Plastic Surgery
Published
2019-11
Volume
83
Issue
5
Pages
500-506
ISSN
  • 0148-7043 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-3708
OpenAlex
W2981027941
Cited by
8
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Plastic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Keywords
postauricular flap, operative time reduction, congenital ear deformity
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Adolescent, Adult, Cartilage, Ear Cartilage, Ear, External, Female, Humans, Male, Surgical Flaps, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review