A Modification of the Posterior Perichondrio-Adipo-Dermal Flap for Protruding Ear Correction: A Customized Technique
Abstract
Prominent ear deformity is a common congenital deformity of the external ear affecting 5% of the general population. Because of the deformity's displeasing nature, corrective prominent ear surgery is widely common and performed as a prophylactic surgery. More than 200 surgical techniques for the correction of prominent ear deformity have been described to improve the cosmetic outcome and decrease complication rates. The aim of the study was to present a modified post auricular flap technique that increases the control of reshaping the ear cartilages, decreases the operation time, and provides a symmetrical long-lasting cosmetic outcome.One hundred sixty-two patients (141 male and 21 female) had ear correction surgeries performed by the same surgeon using the described technique between January 2015 and January 2018. One hundred sixty patients were gone through bilateral ear correction, whereas only 2 patients had unilateral ear correction procedures. A modified posterior perichondrio-adipo-dermal flap technique for protruding ear correction was applied to all patients.The patients' ages ranged from 18 to 40 years, with a median of 28.3 years. The mean follow-up time was 22.5 months (6-36 months). Total operation time was 35 minutes on average (25-45 minutes). As more experience was gained in flap harvesting, operation time became shorter. The mean preoperative upper third ear proportion-scalp distance was 33.1 mm and the middle third ear proportion-scalp distance was 29.8 mm. At the sixth month of the surgery, the measurements were 9.8 and 11.6 mm.Measuring and adjusting flap's width provided to achieve symmetry in initial technique. Locating the postoperative scar along the posterior surface of the helical groove also provides a natural view. Different from traditional posterior fascial flap, the width of the flap was narrowed to 8 to 10 mm. In the traditional technique, the flap was dissected along the incision margins. Narrowing the width of the flap decreased the operation time. The preserved skin between the helix and the mastoid bone has the same width with perichondrio-adipo-dermal flap. That increases the control over the helix-mastoid distance and posterior auricular fold not to mention provides permanent results. The previously mentioned method can be a simple, useful, and practical technique for protruding ear deformity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Correction of prominent ears by concha-mastoid sutures
FURNAS, D. W. (1968) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-196809000-00001 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
The postauricular fascial flap as an adjunct to Mustardé and Furnas type otoplasty.
Horlock, N., Misra, A., & Gault, D. T. (2001) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-200111000-00005 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Comparison of cartilage scoring and cartilage sparing otoplasty: a study of 203 cases.
Mandal, A., Bahia, H., Ahmad, T., & Stewart, K. J. (2006) · Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2006.01.055 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Correction of Prominent Ears Using Buried Mattress Sutures
Mustardé, J. C. (1978) · Clinics in Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0094-1298(20)32150-7 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Long-term results of posterior suturing with postauricular fascial flap otoplasty.
Schaverien, M. V., Al-Busaidi, S., & Stewart, K. J. (2010) · Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2009.09.013 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Postauricular fascial flap and suture otoplasty: a prospective outcome study of 227 patients.
Sinha, M., & Richard, B. (2012) · Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2011.09.018 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Shokrollahi, K., Cooper, M. A., & Hiew, L. Y. (2009) · Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2008.03.018 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Scuderi, N., Tenna, S., Bitonti, A., & Vonella, M. (2007) · Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2006.01.035 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Smittenberg, M. N., Marsman, M., Veeger, N. J. G. M., & Moues, C. M. (2018) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000004241 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Shokrollahi, K., Taylor, J. P., le Roux, C. M., et al. (2013) · Annals of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1097/sap.0b013e31826cb2b5 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Histomorphology of Neochondrogenesis After Antihelical Fold Creation
Weinzweig, N., Chen, L., & Sullivan, W. G. (1994) · Annals of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000637-199410000-00003 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Cihandide, E., Kayiran, O., Aydin, E. E., & Uzunismail, A. (2016) · Journal of Craniofacial Surgery · doi:10.1097/scs.0000000000002607 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Otoplasty: experience with a modification using a drill, and literature review
Bajaj, Y., Rokade, A., & De, P. R. (2006) · The Journal of Laryngology & Otology · doi:10.1017/s0022215106003689 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Sensibility of the Ear After Otoplasty
Coltro, P. S., Alves, H. R. N., Gallafrio, S. T., Busnardo, F. D. F., & Ferreira, M. C. (2011) · Annals of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1097/sap.0b013e31820bcc11 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Basat, S. O., Askeroğlu, U., Aksan, T., Alleyne, B., Yazar, M., Orman, Ç., Üsçetin, İ., & Akan, M. (2014) · Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00266-013-0269-z · Cited by 14 · see citing works
A New Way for Antihelixplasty in Prominent Ear Surgery: Modified Postauricular Fascial Flap
Taş, S., & Benlier, E. (2016) · Annals of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1097/sap.0000000000000309 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Complications of Cartilage Sparing Otoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Alanazi, H. (2024) · Journal of Craniofacial Surgery · doi:10.1097/scs.0000000000009976 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Otoplasty Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes: A Practical Review
Kaleeny, J. D., & Janis, J. E. (2026) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open · doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000007404
“Velcro headband worn at night for a month Foda 82 Penrose drain, light-pressure dressing applied with vaselinized ribbon Not specified Horlock 83 Not specified Head bandage applied for 1 wk Schaverien 84 Standard head bandage applied and is replaced Headband worn at night for 6 wk Schlegel-Wagner 85 Soft dressing remo…”
Otoplasty for prominent ear: A systematic review of surgical techniques
Thomson, H., Gosden, J., & Mandal, A. (2026) · JPRAS Open · doi:10.1016/j.jpra.2026.02.013
- Authors
- Ersen, B.
- Corresponding author
- Ersen, Burak
- ORCID
- Ersen, Burak
- Venue
- Annals of Plastic Surgery
- Published
- 2019-11
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 500-506
- ISSN
- 0148-7043 (ISSN-L)
- 1536-3708
- OpenAlex
- W2981027941
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Plastic Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
- Keywords
- postauricular flap, operative time reduction, congenital ear deformity
- MeSH terms
- Adipose Tissue, Adolescent, Adult, Cartilage, Ear Cartilage, Ear, External, Female, Humans, Male, Surgical Flaps, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review