Cited by 33Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesNasal Surgery and Airway Studies

The psychologic and psychosocial impact of otoplasty on children and adults.

Papadopulos, Nikolaos A., Niehaus, Richard, Keller, Emanuel, Henrich, Gerhard, Papadopoulos, Othon N., Staudenmaier, Rainer, Kovacs, Laszlo, Peter Herschbach +2 more·2015·Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In previous studies, our research group already evaluated the impact of aesthetic surgery on "quality of life" (QoL). This study evaluates QoL factors and perceptions of well-being after otoplasty as a single indication. METHODS: Eighty-one patients who underwent otoplasty were divided into three age groups: Youth 1 (Y1) = 8-12 years (n = 17), Youth 1 (Y2) = 13-17 years (n = 13), and Adult ≥18 years (n = 51). For competitive analysis, 2 groups of tests were used: a standardized self-assessment test on life satisfaction (FLZ(M)), the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI), the standardized Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), the standardized Freiburg Personality Inventory (FPI-R), the Patient Health Questionnaire 4 (PHQ-4), and a self-developed and indication-specific questionnaire for "Adult" group. The tools for the groups Y1 and Y2 were: PHQ-4, KINDL(R), the Glasgow Child Benefit Inventory (GCBI), and a self-developed and indication-specific questionnaire either. RESULTS: Our data bared numerous significant improvements on patients' QoL. In the items "friends" (P = 0.036) and "freedom of anxiety" (P = 0.034) of the FLZ(M), important improvements were found. In section "satisfaction with appearance" (body image), the items "hair" (P = 0.003) and "ear" (P = 0.034) were to point out. The RSES (P = 0.001) and the FPI-R (P = 0.035) data indicated a well-balanced emotional stability. The results of the GBI/GCBI (P = 0.000/P = 0.000) showed a higher QoL of postsurgery patients. The data of the KINDL questionnaire provided increasing values in the modules "friends" (P = 0.033) and "total score" (P = 0.040) for boys of the ages 8 to 12. For all age groups, there was a less affinity to depression (PHQ-4) and a high satisfaction with the aesthetical result (indication-specific questionnaire). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed higher QoL in all age groups by using standardized tools in comparison with the norm data. The knowledge of postoperative psychologic benefits, such as "satisfaction with appearance" (body image) and "different areas of life," self-confidence, and self-esteem as well as lower level of depression support meaningfulness of otoplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III: Retrospective cohort or comparative study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/scs.0000000000001990

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Otoplasty improves emotional, physical, and social well-being in children and adults alike, enhancing body image and reducing social anxiety.

    “Otoplasty improves emotional, physical, and social well-being in children and adults alike, enhancing body image and reducing social anxiety.75–79”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papadopulos, N. A., Niehaus, R., Keller, E., Henrich, G., Papadopoulos, O. N., Staudenmaier, R., Kovacs, L., Herschbach, P., Pototschnig, H., & Machens, H.-G.
Venue
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2015-11
Volume
26
Issue
8
Pages
2309-2314
ISSN
1049-2275 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1809444478
Cited by
33
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Keywords
otoplasty, quality of life, psychosocial outcomes, cosmetic surgery, body image, self-esteem, life satisfaction, depression, children, adolescents, adults, postoperative outcomes, Glasgow Benefit Inventory, PHQ-4, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Freiburg Personality Inventory, KINDL
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Attitude to Health, Body Image, Child, Depression, Ear, External, Emotions, Esthetics, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Personality, Quality of Life, Retrospective Studies, Self Concept, Cohort Studies, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Friends, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review