Cited by 22Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesAirway Management and Intubation Techniques

Nasal Surgery May Improve Upper Airway Collapse in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy Study

Bosco, Gabriela, Pérez-Martín, Nuria, Morato, Marta, Racionero, Miguel A., Plaza, Guillermo·2020·Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of nasal surgery in the upper airway (UA) collapse using drug induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) in a group of patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). METHODS: Prospective cohort of patients treated with nasal surgery between 2015 and 2016. All patients were diagnosed with mild to severe OSAHS. The inclusion criteria were age between 18 and 70 years, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) higher than 15, and septal deviation. All patients had a DISE performed before surgery and 3 months after. The DISE findings were evaluated through the NOHL scale. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were included. Surgical success with subjective and objective improvement in nasal obstructions was achieved in all cases. The pattern of UA obstruction did change significantly following nasal surgery (P < 0.05). Before nasal surgery, 74% of the patients demonstrated multilevel obstruction. After nasal surgery, only 50% patients showed multilevel collapse (P < 0.05). Among patients with single-level collapse, the oropharynx was the most common location of obstruction. It became more frequent after nasal surgery was done (41% vs 21%, P < 0.05). Significant improvement was shown in hypopharyngeal collapse. Postoperative AHI decreased from a mean of 26.7 to 19 events/h, but this change was not significant. CONCLUSION: Nasal surgery may improve hypopharyngeal collapses observed during DISE in patients with OSAHS. Thus, an improvement in nasal obstruction may also modify the surgical plan based on UA functional findings in OSAHS patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/scs.0000000000005865

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bosco, G., Pérez-Martín, N., Morato, M., Racionero, M. A., & Plaza, G.
Affiliations
  • Department of Otolaryngology
  • Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (ES)
Corresponding author
  • Bosco, Gabriela
  • Morato, Marta
  • Plaza, Guillermo
Venue
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2020-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
68-71
ISSN
  • 1049-2275 (ISSN-L)
  • 1536-3732
OpenAlex
W2970795870
Cited by
22
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
Keywords
nasal surgery, obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome, upper airway collapse, drug-induced sleep endoscopy, septal deviation, nasal obstruction, oropharyngeal obstruction, apnea-hypopnea index
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Endoscopy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nose, Oropharynx, Prospective Studies, Sleep, Nasal Obstruction, Polysomnography, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Young Adult, Nasal Surgical Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review