Cited by 32Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesAirway Management and Intubation Techniques

Effects of nasal surgery on the upper airway: A drug-induced sleep endoscopy study

Victores, Andrew Jacob, Takashima, Masayoshi·2012·The Laryngoscope

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate the impact of nasal surgery on the oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal anatomy of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) by comparing drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) data prior to and following nasal surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of medical records and DISE video recordings. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with OSA were identified who underwent nasal surgery for symptomatic nasal obstruction. Clinic charts and DISE video recordings were reviewed. Preoperative and postoperative DISE recordings were compared to determine whether nasal surgery affected the level, degree, and sustainability of upper airway obstruction. RESULTS: Overall, the pattern of upper airway obstruction did not change significantly following nasal surgery (P > .05). Almost all patients demonstrated residual obstruction by postoperative DISE (96%), with no change in plans for surgical management of oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal collapse (83%). Partial improvement in palatal collapse was present in a subset of patients without tongue base obstruction (P < .05). Postoperative apnea-hypopnea index decreased from a mean of 23.6 to 20.4 events/hr, but this change was not significant (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: For most patients with OSA, surgical repair of nasal obstruction does not significantly improve oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal collapse as seen on DISE. However, mild improvement in palatal collapse is seen in a subset of patients without tongue base obstruction. This study reveals that if DISE is being utilized to direct surgical management of OSA, it does not need to be repeated for most patients after nasal surgery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/lary.23584

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Victores, A. J., & Takashima, M.
Affiliations
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Takashima, Masayoshi
Venue
The Laryngoscope
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-08-08
Volume
122
Issue
11
Pages
2606-2610
ISSN
  • 0023-852X (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4995
OpenAlex
W2121899913
Cited by
32
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Laryngoscope (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
Keywords
nasal surgery, obstructive sleep apnea, upper airway obstruction, drug-induced sleep endoscopy, oropharyngeal collapse, tongue base obstruction, nasal obstruction, apnea-hypopnea index
MeSH terms
Adult, Endoscopy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Video Recording, Nasal Obstruction, Propofol, Treatment Outcome, Anesthetics, Intravenous, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review