Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 221

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sentinel Node Mapping Guided by Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging in Gastric Cancer

Tajima, Yusuke, Yamazaki, Kimiyasu, Masuda, Yuki, Kato, Masanori, Yasuda, Daisuke, Aoki, Takeshi, Kato, Takashi, Murakami, Masahiko, Miwa, Mitsuharu, Kusano, Mitsuo·2009·Annals of Surgery

Abstract

In Brief Objective: In this study, we determined the possible usefulness of sentinel node (SN) mapping guided by indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging in the management of gastric cancer. Summary Background Data: ICG fluorescence imaging system has recently been developed for obtaining biochemical information from living tissues. Methods: Our series consisted of 56 patients with gastric cancer who underwent standard gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy. Two milliliters of ICG solution (0.5%) was injected into the submucosa around the tumor endoscopically before the operation or into the subserosa intraoperatively. ICG fluorescence imaging was conducted using a charge-coupled device camera with a light-emitting diode having a wavelength of 760 nm as the light source and a cut filter to filter out light with wavelengths below 820 nm as the detector. Results: SNs were detected in 54 (96.4%) of the 56 patients, and the mean number of SNs was 7.2 ± 7.0. Even SNs that were not green in color could be easily and clearly visualized by ICG fluorescence imaging. cT1-stage cancers were associated with a significantly higher accuracy rate (97.2% vs. 72.2%, P = 0.0127) than cT2-or cT3-stage cancers. Preoperative ICG injection was associated with a significantly higher incidence of cT1-stage cancers (87.1% vs. 40.0%, P = 0.0004), a larger mean number of SNs (9.9 ± 7.5 vs. 4.1 ± 5.0, P < 0.0001), a higher accuracy rate (100% vs. 73.9%, P = 0.0039), and a lower false negative rate (0% vs. 60.0%, P = 0.0345) as compared with intraoperative ICG injection. Conclusions: This study shows that ICG fluorescence imaging allows highly sensitive image-guided intraoperative SN mapping in cases of gastric cancer. Our data suggest that SN mapping guided by ICG fluorescence imaging might be useful for predicting the metastatic status in lymph nodes in cases of gastric cancer, especially those with cT1-stage cancer. In this study, we described a new method of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging, which allows highly sensitive image-guided intraoperative sentinel node mapping in cases of gastric cancer. Our data suggest that sentinel node mapping guided by indocyanine green fluorescence imaging might be useful for predicting the metastatic status in lymph nodes in cases of gastric cancer, especially those with cT1-stage cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181927267

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 221

Metadata

Authors
Tajima, Y., Yamazaki, K., Masuda, Y., Kato, M., Yasuda, D., Aoki, T., Kato, T., Murakami, M., Miwa, M., & Kusano, M.
Venue
Annals of Surgery
Published
2009-01
Volume
249
Issue
1
Pages
58-62
ISSN
0003-4932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080348261
Cited by
221
References
0
FWCI
11.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sentinel Node Mapping Guided by Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging in Gastric Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181927267
The paper
Tajima, Y., Yamazaki, K., Masuda, Y., Kato, M., Yasuda, D., Aoki, T., Kato, T., Murakami, M., Miwa, M., & Kusano, M. (2009). Sentinel Node Mapping Guided by Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging in Gastric Cancer. Annals of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0b013e3181927267

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.