Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 510

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Montreal Cognitive Assessment: Validation Study for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer Disease

Freitas, Sandra, Simões, Mário Rodrigues, Alves, Lara, Santana, Isabel·2013·Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders

Abstract

The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was recently proposed as a cognitive screening test for milder forms of cognitive impairment, having surpassed the well-known limitations of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). This study aims to validate the MoCA for screening Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer disease (AD) through an analysis of diagnostic accuracy and the proposal of cut-offs. Patients were classified into 2 clinical groups according to standard criteria: MCI (n=90) and AD (n=90). The 2 control groups (C-MCI: n=90; C-AD: n=90) consisted of cognitively healthy community dwellers selected to match patients in sex, age, and education. The MoCA showed consistently superior psychometric properties compared with the MMSE, and higher diagnostic accuracy to discriminate between MCI (area under the curve=0.856; 95% confidence interval, 0.796-0.904) and AD patients (area under the curve=0.980; 95% confidence interval, 0.947-0.995). At an optimal cut-off of below 22 for MCI and below 17 for AD, the MoCA achieved significantly superior values in comparison with MMSE for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and classification accuracy. Furthermore, the MoCA revealed higher sensitivity to cognitive decline in longitudinal monitoring. This study provides robust evidence that the MoCA is a better cognitive tool than the widely used MMSE for the screening and monitoring of MCI and AD in clinical settings.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/wad.0b013e3182420bfe

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Lobo, 2000, Prevalence of dementia and major subtypes in Europe: a collaborative study of population-based cohorts., Neurology, 54, S4
  2. Comas-Herrera, 2011, Future costs of dementia-related long-term care: exploring future scenarios., Int Psychogeriatr, 23, 20, 10.1017/S1041610210000025 · doi:10.1017/s1041610210000025
  3. Langa, 2001, National estimates of the quantity and cost of informal caregiving for the elderly with dementia., J Gen Intern Med, 16, 770, 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.10123.x · doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2001.10123.x · Paper page
  4. Ferri, 2005, Global prevalence of dementia: a Delphi consensus study., Lancet, 366, 2112, 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67889-0 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Wimo, 2004, The magnitude of dementia occurrence in the world., Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord, 17, 63, 10.1097/00002093-200304000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Petersen, 2000, Mild cognitive impairment: transition between aging and Alzheimers disease., Neurology, 15, 93
  7. Petersen, 2004, Mild cognitive impairment as a diagnostic entity., J Intern Med, 256, 183, 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01388.x · DOI · Paper page
  8. Petersen, 2007, Mild cognitive impairment., Contin Lifelong Learn Neurol, 13, 15, 10.1212/01.CON.0000267234.69379.4e · DOI
  9. Smith, 2007, The Montreal Cognitive Assessment: validity and utility in a memory clinic setting., Can J Psychiatry, 52, 329, 10.1177/070674370705200508 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Rahman, 2009, Montreal Cognitive Assessment Arabic version: reliability and validity prevalence of mild cognitive impairment among elderly attending geriatric clubs in Cairo., Geriatr Gerontol Int, 9, 54, 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2008.00509.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. Wen, 2008, The application of Montreal Cognitive Assessment in urban Chinese residents of Beijing., Chin J Intern Med, 47, 36
  12. Lee, 2008, Brief screening for mild cognitive impairment in elderly outpatient clinic: validation of the Korean version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment., J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, 21, 104, 10.1177/0891988708316855 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Luis, 2009, Cross validation of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in community dwelling older adults residing in the Southeastern US., Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 24, 197, 10.1002/gps.2101 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Fujiwara, 2010, Brief screening toll for mild cognitive impairment in older Japanese: validation of the Japanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment., Geriatr Gerontol Int, 10, 225, 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2010.00585.x · DOI · Paper page
  15. Zhao, 2011, A clinical memory battery for screening for amnestic mild cognitive impairment in an elderly Chinese population., J Clin Neurosci, 18, 774, 10.1016/j.jocn.2010.07.149 · DOI
  16. Damian, 2011, The Montreal Cognitive Assessment and the Mini-Mental State Examination as screening instruments for cognitive impairment: item analyses and threshold scores., Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord, 31, 126, 10.1159/000323867 · DOI
  17. Koski, 2009, Measuring cognition in a geriatric outpatients clinic: rash analysis of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment., J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, 22, 151, 10.1177/0891988709332944 · DOI
  18. Koski, 2011, Improving precision in the quantification of cognition using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and the Mini-Mental State Examination., Int Psychogeriatr, 1, 1
  19. Freitas, 2010, The sensitivity of the MoCA and MMSE to cognitive decline: a longitudinal study., Alzheimers Dement, 6, S353, 10.1016/j.jalz.2010.05.1184 · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2010.05.1184
  20. Hughes, 1982, A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia., Br J Psychiatry, 140, 566, 10.1192/bjp.140.6.566 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Schmand, 1996, Subjective memory complaints may announce dementia., Neurology, 46, 121, 10.1212/WNL.46.1.121 · DOI · Paper page
  22. McKhann, 1984, Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimers disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of the Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimers disease., Neurology, 34, 939, 10.1212/WNL.34.7.939 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Freitas, 2010, Estudos de adaptacao do Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) para a populacao portuguesa Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): Portuguese adaptation studies., Avaliacao Psicologica, 9, 345
  24. Hanley, 1983, A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves., Radiology, 148, 839, 10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878708 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Freitas, S., Simões, M. R., Alves, L., & Santana, I.
Venue
Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders
Published
2013-01
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
37-43
ISSN
0893-0341 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074760672
Cited by
510
References
5
FWCI
6.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.