Cited by 81Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

What have we learned from recent twin studies about the etiology of neurodevelopmental disorders?

Posthuma, Danielle, Polderman, Tinca J.C.·2013·Current Opinion in Neurology

Abstract

Purpose of review The relative influence of genes and environment on the liability to neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) can be investigated using a twin design. This review highlights the results of the most recent twin studies of NDDs. Recent findings Recent twin studies have confirmed that NDDs show moderate-to-high heritability, and that from an etiological viewpoint both autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are best regarded as the extremes on a continuous liability distribution. Both ASD and ADHD show high heritability in childhood and a substantial drop in heritability in adulthood, which is likely explained by the use of different assessment strategies in childhood versus adulthood, or by a complex mechanism of gene-by-environment interaction. NDDs show substantial comorbidity among each other, and with other mental health problems, which is partly because of a shared genetic etiology between different disorders. Summary The findings of twin studies implicate substantial heritability of NDDs, and warrant large-scale molecular genetic studies for such traits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/wco.0b013e32835f19c3

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An inverse association between parental SES and childhood ADHD is expected by virtue of the high heritability of childhood ADHD along with an association of ADHD with low socioeconomic attainment.

    “we would expect an inverse association with parental SES by virtue of the high heritability of childhood ADHD (Posthuma and Polderman 2013) along with an association of ADHD with low socioeconomic attainment (Polderman et al. 2010)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Posthuma, D., & Polderman, T. J. C.
Affiliations
Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL)
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurology
Published
2013-04
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
111-121
ISSN
1350-7540 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048438388
Cited by
81
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Keywords
neurodevelopmental disorders, heritability, twin studies, autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, gene-environment interaction, liability distribution, comorbidities, shared genetic etiology, molecular genetics
MeSH terms
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Mental Disorders, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Humans, Comorbidity, Twin Studies as Topic, Gene-Environment Interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review