Cited by 103Infant Health and DevelopmentNeuroscience and Music PerceptionMind wandering and attention

Sex differences in directional brain responses to infant hunger cries

Open access
De Pisapia, Nicola, Bornstein, Marc H., Rigo, Paola, Esposito, Gianluca, De Falco, Simona, Venuti, Paola·2013·Neuroreport

Abstract

Infant cries are a critical survival mechanism that draw the attention of adult caregivers, who can then satisfy the basic needs of otherwise helpless infants. Here, we used functional neuroimaging to determine the effects of infant hunger cries on the brain activity of adults who were in a cognitively nondemanding mental state of awake rest. We found that the brains of men and women, independent of parental status (parent or nonparent), reacted differently to infant cries. Specifically, the dorsal medial prefrontal and posterior cingulate areas, known to be involved in mind wandering (the stream of thought typical of awake rest), remained active in men during exposure to infant cries, whereas in women, activity in these regions decreased. These results show sex-dependent modulation of brain responses to infant requests to be fed, and specifically, they indicate that women interrupt mind wandering when exposed to the sounds of infant hunger cries, whereas men carry on without interruption.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/wnr.0b013e32835df4fa

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [4]Whiting BB Edwards CP Children of Different Worlds 1988 Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Pisapia, N., Bornstein, M. H., Rigo, P., Esposito, G., De Falco, S., & Venuti, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Trento (IT)
  • RIKEN (JP)
Venue
Neuroreport
Published
2013-02-13
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
142-146
ISSN
0959-4965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061908227
Cited by
103
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3
FWCI
17.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroreport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (ZIAHD001119)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
Keywords
sex differences, brain responses, mind wandering, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, parental status, infant feeding, caregiver attention
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Arousal, Brain, Brain Mapping, Crying, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Oxygen, Sex Characteristics, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review