The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Revised National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Pressure Injury Staging System: Revised Pressure Injury Staging System
Open accessAbstract
Our understanding of pressure injury etiology and development has grown in recent years through research, clinical expertise, and global interdisciplinary expert collaboration. Therefore, the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) has revised the definition and stages of pressure injury. The revision was undertaken to incorporate the current understanding of the etiology of pressure injuries, as well as to clarify the anatomical features present or absent in each stage of injury. An NPUAP-appointed Task Force reviewed the literature and created drafts of definitions, which were then reviewed by stakeholders and the public, including clinicians, educators, and researchers around the world. Using a consensus-building methodology, these revised definitions were the focus of a multidisciplinary consensus conference held in April 2016. As a result of stakeholder and public input, along with the consensus conference, important changes were made and incorporated into the new staging definitions. The revised staging system uses the term injury instead of ulcer and denotes stages using Arabic numerals rather than Roman numerals. The revised definition of a pressure injury now describes the injuries as usually occurring over a bony prominence or under a medical or other device. The revised definition of a Stage 2 pressure injury seeks to clarify the difference between moisture-associated skin damage and injury caused by pressure and/or shear. The term suspected has been removed from the Deep Tissue Pressure Injury diagnostic label. Each definition now describes the extent of tissue loss present and the anatomical features that may or may not be present in the stage of injury. These important revisions reflect the methodical and collaborative approach used to examine the available evidence and incorporate current interdisciplinary clinical expertise into better defining the important phenomenon of pressure injury etiology and development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pressure Sores Classification and Management
SHEA, J. D. (1975) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/00003086-197510000-00012 · Cited by 425
Medical device related pressure ulcers in hospitalized patients
Black, J. M., Cuddigan, J. E., Walko, M. A., Didier, L. A., Lander, M. J., & Kelpe, M. R. (2010) · International Wound Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1742-481x.2010.00699.x · Cited by 329
Self-citationMcNichol, L., Lund, C., Rosen, T., & Gray, M. (2013) · Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing · doi:10.1097/won.0b013e3182995516 · Cited by 217
Self-citationHistopathology of the decubitus ulcer
Witkowski, J. A., & Parish, L. C. (1982) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/s0190-9622(82)70085-4 · Cited by 171
The effect of protective treatment in reducing pressure ulcers for non-invasive ventilation patients
Weng, M.-H. (2008) · Intensive and Critical Care Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.iccn.2007.11.005 · Cited by 104
Prevention of pressure ulcers after pediatric tracheotomy using a Mepilex Ag dressing
Kuo, C. Y., Wootten, C. T., Tylor, D. A., et al. (2013) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1002/lary.24094 · Cited by 62
Pressure ulcer tissue histology: an appraisal of current knowledge.
Edsberg, L. E. (2007) · PubMed · Cited by 35
Self-citation
Cited by
The national cost of hospital-acquired pressure injuries in the United States.
Padula, W. V., & Delarmente, B. A. (2019) · International Wound Journal · doi:10.1111/iwj.13071 · Cited by 631
August, D. L., New, K., Ray, R. A., & Kandasamy, Y. (2018) · Journal of Neonatal Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.jnn.2017.08.003 · Cited by 58
Direct metagenomics investigation of non-surgical hard-to-heal wounds: a review
Morsli, M., Salipante, F., Magnan, C., Dunyach-Remy, C., Sotto, A., & Lavigne, J.-P. (2024) · Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials · doi:10.1186/s12941-024-00698-z · Cited by 26
Pressure Injury Prediction Model Using Advanced Analytics for At-Risk Hospitalized Patients
Do, Q., Lipatov, K., Ramar, K., Rasmusson, J., Pickering, B. W., & Herasevich, V. (2022) · Journal of Patient Safety · doi:10.1097/pts.0000000000001013 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Edsberg, L. E., Black, J. M., Goldberg, M., McNichol, L., Moore, L., & Sieggreen, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing
- Published
- 2016-11
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 585-597
- ISSN
- 1071-5754 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2527910541
- Cited by
- 1,123
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 146.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revised National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Pressure Injury Staging System: Revised Pressure Injury Staging System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/won.0000000000000281
- The paper
- Edsberg, L. E., Black, J. M., Goldberg, M., McNichol, L., Moore, L., & Sieggreen, M. (2016). Revised National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Pressure Injury Staging System: Revised Pressure Injury Staging System. Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1097/won.0000000000000281
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.