The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Medical Adhesives and Patient Safety: State of the Science Consensus Statements for the Assessment, Prevention, and Treatment of Adhesive-Related Skin Injuries
Abstract
Skin injury related to medical adhesive usage is a prevalent but underrecognized complication that occurs across all care settings and among all age groups. If proper technique for application and/or removal of adhesive products is not used, tissue trauma can occur, impacting patient safety and quality of life and increasing healthcare costs. Little guidance exists in the literature regarding appropriate selection and proper use of adhesive products to minimize medical adhesive-related skin injury, as well as best practices for skin care preventive strategies, application and removal techniques, and assessment and treatment of such injuries. In an effort to define best practices for prevention of such injury, a consensus panel of 23 recognized key opinion leaders convened to establish consensus statements on the assessment, prevention, and treatment of medical adhesive-related skin injury. The consensus summit was held in December 2012 and was made possible by an unrestricted educational grant from 3M. This document details the consensus definitions and statements and identifies research priorities for development of new adhesive technologies and protocols for skin protection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The 2003 National Pediatric Pressure Ulcer and Skin Breakdown Prevalence Survey: A Multisite Study
McLane, K. M., Bookout, K., McCord, S., McCain, J., & Jefferson, L. S. (2004) · Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing · doi:10.1097/00152192-200407000-00004 · Cited by 129
Cited by
Edsberg, L. E., Black, J. M., Goldberg, M., McNichol, L., Moore, L., & Sieggreen, M. (2016) · Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing · doi:10.1097/won.0000000000000281 · Cited by 1,123
Self-citationLund, C. (2014) · Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews · doi:10.1053/j.nainr.2014.10.001 · Cited by 128
Self-citationFröhlich‐Reiterer, E., Elbarbary, N. S., Simmons, K., Buckingham, B., Humayun, K. N., Johannsen, J., Holl, R. W., Betz, S., & Mahmud, F. H. (2022) · Pediatric Diabetes · doi:10.1111/pedi.13445 · Cited by 74
Inflammation-free and gas-permeable on-skin triboelectric nanogenerator using soluble nanofibers
Du, W., Nie, J., Ren, Z., Jiang, T., Xu, L., Dong, S., Zheng, L., Chen, X., & Li, H. (2018) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.06.026 · Cited by 64
August, D. L., New, K., Ray, R. A., & Kandasamy, Y. (2018) · Journal of Neonatal Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.jnn.2017.08.003 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- McNichol, L., Lund, C., Rosen, T., & Gray, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 365-380
- ISSN
- 1071-5754 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1534177457
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Medical Adhesives and Patient Safety: State of the Science Consensus Statements for the Assessment, Prevention, and Treatment of Adhesive-Related Skin Injuries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/won.0b013e3182995516
- The paper
- McNichol, L., Lund, C., Rosen, T., & Gray, M. (2013). Medical Adhesives and Patient Safety: State of the Science Consensus Statements for the Assessment, Prevention, and Treatment of Adhesive-Related Skin Injuries. Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1097/won.0b013e3182995516
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
