Cited by 264Migration, Health and TraumaPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchHealth and Conflict Studies

The ADAPT model: A conceptual framework for mental health and psychosocial programming in post conflict settings

Silove, Derrick·2013·Intervention

Abstract

There is a growing consensus concerning the scope and components of mental health and psychosocial interventions needed to assist populations exposed to mass conflict. The Adaptation and Development after Persecution and Trauma (ADAPT) model offers a unifying, conceptual framework to underpin policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/wtf.0000000000000005

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Silove, D.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Silove, Derrick
Venue
Intervention
Published
2013-11
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
237-248
ISSN
1571-8883 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2329677319
Cited by
264
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
8.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Intervention (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Conflict Studies
Keywords
ADAPT model, mental health interventions, psychosocial interventions, post-conflict adaptation, trauma, conceptual framework, humanitarian policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review