Cited by 23Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorDigital Mental Health Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Internet eating disorder prevention

Wade, Tracey D., Wilksch, Simon M.·2018·Current Opinion in Psychiatry

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Internet prevention of eating disorders is a relatively new field that is expanding rapidly. We review randomized controlled trial designs examining the efficacy of Internet prevention in eating disorders that have emerged from 2016. RECENT FINDINGS: Our literature search identified five studies that used randomized controlled trial designs to examine the efficacy of Internet prevention in eating disorders. All of the studies represented indicated prevention, that is, young women who have body image concerns. Three specific approaches were examined: media literacy, cognitive dissonance, and cognitive behavior therapy. All studies indicated significantly more impact of the intervention than a control condition, with between group effect sizes at follow-up ranging from 0.24 to 0.42. SUMMARY: Although Internet interventions for eating disorders may be less effective than face-to-face interventions, and attrition increases when populations are used that reflect real-world usage, these interventions have an important role in a stepped-care approach. Future research should make direct comparisons of different Internet programs with a view to helping us understand who will gain most benefit out of which approach, including who requires moderated Internet approaches and who does not.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/yco.0000000000000450

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 23

Metadata

Authors
Wade, T. D., & Wilksch, S. M.
Affiliations
Flinders University (AU)
Corresponding author
Wade, Tracey D.
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Published
2018-11
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
456-461
ISSN
0951-7367 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2893767161
Cited by
23
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
eating disorder prevention, online intervention, body image concern, young women, media literacy, cognitive dissonance, cognitive behavioral therapy, stepped care, attrition, randomized controlled trials
MeSH terms
Feeding and Eating Disorders, Cognitive Dissonance, Computer Literacy, Female, Humans, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review