Cited by 23Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorDigital Mental Health Interventions

Associations between eating disorder related symptoms and participants’ utilization of an individualized I nternet‐based prevention and early intervention program

Kindermann, Sally, Moessner, Markus, Ozer, Fikret, Bauer, Stephanie·2017·International Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

Objective: Flexible, individualized interventions allow participants to adjust the intensity of support to their current needs. Between‐persons, participants with greater needs can receive more intense support, within‐persons, participants can adjust utilization to their current level of symptoms. The purpose of the present study was to analyze associations between ED‐related symptoms and utilization of the individualized program ProYouth both between‐ and within‐persons, aiming to investigate whether participants adapt utilization intensity to their current needs. Method: Generalized estimated equations (GEEs) were used to analyze log data on program utilization (monthly page visits, monthly use of chats and forum) assessed via server logs and self‐reported data on ED‐related symptoms from N = 394 ProYouth participants who provided longitudinal data for at least two months. Results: Between‐persons, page visits per month were significantly associated with compensatory behavior, body dissatisfaction, and binge eating. Monthly use of the more intense modules with personal support chat and forum was associated with the frequency of compensatory behavior. Within‐persons, unbalanced nutrition and dieting showed the strongest associations with monthly page visits. Monthly use of chats and forum was significantly associated with compensatory behavior and unbalanced nutrition and dieting. Discussion: Results indicate that program utilization is associated with ED‐related symptoms between‐ as well as within‐persons. The individualized, flexible approach of ProYouth thus seems to be a promising way for Internet‐based provision of combined prevention and early intervention programs addressing ED.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eat.22774

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kindermann, S., Moessner, M., Ozer, F., & Bauer, S.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
  • Center for Psychotherapy Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, Bergheimer Str. 54 Heidelberg 69115 Germany
Corresponding author
Kindermann, Sally
Venue
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-09-18
Volume
50
Issue
10
Pages
1215-1221
ISSN
  • 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-108X
OpenAlex
W2754112551
Cited by
23
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
eating disorder symptoms, program utilization, personalized interventions, early intervention, compensatory behavior, body dissatisfaction, binge eating, nutrient imbalance, dieting
MeSH terms
Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Behavior Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Early Intervention, Educational, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review