Cited by 147Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies

Reducing eating disorder symptoms and risk factors using the internet: A meta‐analytic review

Melioli, Tiffany, Bauer, Stephanie, Franko, Debra L., Moessner, Markus, Ozer, Fikret, Chabrol, Henri, Rodgers, Rachel F.·2016·International Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this meta‐analytic review was, first, to evaluate the efficacy of Internet‐based programs in decreasing eating disorder (ED) symptoms, and, second, to identify moderator variables these effects. Method: Twenty studies were identified and between‐group effect sizes were calculated for ED symptoms and risk factors. Results: Compared with control conditions, Internet‐based programs successfully decreased body dissatisfaction (d = 0.28, 95% CI [0.15–0.41], p < .001), internalization of the thin ideal (d = 0.36, 95% CI [0.07–0.65], p < .05), shape and weight concern (d = 0.42, 95% CI [0.13–0.71], p < .05), dietary restriction (d = 0.36, 95% CI [0.23–0.49], p < .001), drive for thinness (d = 0.47, 95% CI [0.33–0.60], p < .001), bulimic symptoms (d = 0.31, 95% CI [0.20–0.41], p < .001), purging frequency (d = 0.30, 95% CI [0.02–0.57], p < .05), and negative affect (d = 0.32, 95% CI [0.12–0.52], p < .001). Moderator analyses revealed no impact of data analytic strategy on intervention effects. Similarly, participant risk status was not a moderator for most outcomes. Discussion: Internet‐based programs are successful in decreasing ED symptoms and risk factors with small to moderate between‐group effect sizes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eat.22477

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Melioli, T., Bauer, S., Franko, D. L., Moessner, M., Ozer, F., Chabrol, H., & Rodgers, R. F.
Affiliations
  • Université de Toulouse (FR)
  • Center for Psychotherapy Research University Hospital Heidelberg Bergheimerstr. 54 Heidelberg 69115 Germany
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
Corresponding author
Melioli, Tiffany
Venue
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-11-26
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
19-31
ISSN
  • 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-108X
OpenAlex
W2174951980
Cited by
147
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Keywords
eating disorders, online intervention, body dissatisfaction, thin-ideal internalization, drive for thinness, bulimic symptoms, purging behavior, dietary restriction, weight concern, negative affect, eating disorder risk factors, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Feeding and Eating Disorders, Body Image, Humans, Risk Factors, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review