Cited by 36Health Policy Implementation SciencePsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychiatric care and mental health services

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adaptation, personalization and capacity in mental health treatments: a balancing act?

Open access
Bennett, Sophie D., Shafran, Roz·2023·Current Opinion in Psychiatry

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There are increasing calls for mental health treatments to be adapted for different groups to maximize their acceptability and benefit to patients. However, adaptations can be costly to develop and evaluate, difficult to implement in routine clinical practice and may reduce service capacity at a time when there is unprecedented unmet need. An alternative method is personalization on an individual level. This review provides an overview of the issues related to personalization and adaptation of mental health interventions. RECENT FINDINGS: Several terms have been used to describe changes to existing therapies, these reflect different extents to which existing treatments have been changed. Evidence-based practice and modular therapies allow a level of flexibility within intervention delivery without formal changes and not all changes to therapy should be considered as a new/adapted treatment but instead regarded as 'metacompetence'. Implementing existing interventions in new contexts is preferable to developing new interventions in many instances. New guidance outlines how researchers can adapt and transfer interventions to varied contexts. SUMMARY: The review provides proposed definitions of different changes to therapy. Modified and personalized treatments may improve acceptability to patients whilst maximizing implementation of evidence-based practice within clinical services.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/yco.0000000000000834

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adaptive treatment models that tailor interventions to an individual's changing needs and capacities can enhance the effectiveness of interventions.

    “Additionally, the integration of adaptive treatment models that tailor interventions to an individual’s changing needs and capacities, as discussed by Bennett and Shafran [43], can enhance the effectiveness of these interventions by ensuring that they remain relevant over time.”

    From Mental Health in Healthcare Workers Post-COVID-19: A Latin American Review and Insights into Personalized Management Strategies (2024) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Personalization section describes using weekly symptom and goal measurements to guide treatment choices, and the Conclusion says personalized treatments may improve relevance and acceptability. But the Adaptation versus Implementation section says increased efficacy from adaptation has yet to be established; the paper does not show that tailoring to changing individual capacities improves effectiveness over time. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bennett, S. D., & Shafran, R.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Bennett, Sophie D.
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Published
2022-10-22
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
28-33
ISSN
  • 0951-7367 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-6578
OpenAlex
W4307497367
Cited by
36
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7
FWCI
7.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
personalized treatment, service capacity, evidence-based practice, meta-competencies, intervention implementation, unmet mental health needs, treatment acceptability, intervention transfer
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Mental Health, Psychotherapy, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review