Cited by 125Pain Management and TreatmentPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

New developments in the understanding and management of persistent pain

Flor, Herta·2012·Current Opinion in Psychiatry

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: It is proposed that central rather than peripheral factors may be important in pain chronicity. We review recent empirical findings on these processes and discuss implications for treatment and prevention. RECENT FINDINGS: The literature on neuroimaging of pain and on learning processes shows that learning-induced functional and structural brain changes involving sensorimotor, as well as limbic and frontal, areas are important in the transition from acute to chronic pain. These alterations share many similarities with brain changes in emotional disorders and the specificity for pain needs to be determined. Further important contributors to chronic pain may be disturbed processing of the body image, impaired multisensory integration and faulty feedback from interoceptive processes. These findings have led to new treatment approaches that focus on the extinction of aversive memories, restoration of the body image and normal brain function and include approaches such as brain stimulation, mirror training, virtual reality applications or behavioral extinction training. SUMMARY: We propose that chronic pain is characterized by learning-related and memory-related plastic changes of the central nervous system with concomitant maladaptive changes in body perception. These alterations require new treatments that focus on the alteration of central pain memories and maladaptive body perception.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/yco.0b013e3283503510

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Harm expectations that cause fear and avoidance have a particularly salient influence on pain-related functional outcomes and treatment responsiveness.

    “GL challenges harm expectations that cause fear and avoidance, which have a particularly salient influence on pain-related functional outcomes[14; 52; 70; 71] and treatment responsiveness[54].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flor, H.
Affiliations
Heidelberg University (DE)
Corresponding author
Flor, Herta
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Published
2012-03
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
109-113
ISSN
0951-7367 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076438733
Cited by
125
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
14.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
chronic pain, central sensitization, neuroplasticity, pain memory, extinction training, body image, multisensory integration, interoception, mirror training, virtual reality, brain stimulation, neuroimaging of pain, transition from acute to chronic pain, pain management
MeSH terms
Body Image, Brain, Conditioning, Operant, Humans, Neuronal Plasticity, Perception, Self Concept, Empirical Research, Chronic Pain, Pain Management, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review