Cited by 451Philosophy and History of SciencePhilosophy and Theoretical ScienceComplex Systems and Dynamics

A theory of biological relativity: no privileged level of causation

Open access
Noble, Denis·2012·Interface Focus

Abstract

Must higher level biological processes always be derivable from lower level data and mechanisms, as assumed by the idea that an organism is completely defined by its genome? Or are higher level properties necessarily also causes of lower level behaviour, involving actions and interactions both ways? This article uses modelling of the heart, and its experimental basis, to show that downward causation is necessary and that this form of causation can be represented as the influences of initial and boundary conditions on the solutions of the differential equations used to represent the lower level processes. These insights are then generalized. A priori, there is no privileged level of causation. The relations between this form of 'biological relativity' and forms of relativity in physics are discussed. Biological relativity can be seen as an extension of the relativity principle by avoiding the assumption that there is a privileged scale at which biological functions are determined.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsfs.2011.0067

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cardiac rhythm is the net consequence of the interplay between a cell's membrane and the ion channels in it.

    “Take, for example, the cardiac rhythm-a behavior that is the net consequence of the interplay between a cell's membrane and the ion channels in it (Noble, 2012).”

    From Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias (2017) · cites this paper as Noble, 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hunter, P., Smaill, B. H., Smith, N. P., Young, A., Nash, M., Nielsen, P. F., Vaughan-Jones, R. D., Omholt, S. & Paterson, D. J. In press. The Heart physiome project. WIREs Syst. Biol. Med.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Noble, D.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Noble, Denis
Venue
Interface Focus
Published
2011-11-09
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
55-64
ISSN
  • 2042-8898 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-8901
OpenAlex
W2151659911
Cited by
451
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 69 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
FWCI
90.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Interface Focus (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Systems and Dynamics
Keywords
downward causation, levels of biological organization, differential equations, initial and boundary conditions, principle of relativity, emergent properties, reductionism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review