Cited by 129Soft Robotics and ApplicationsAdvanced Materials and MechanicsRobotic Locomotion and Control

Exploiting short-term memory in soft body dynamics as a computational resource

Open access
Nakajima, K., Li, T., Hauser, H., Pfeifer, R.·2014·Journal of The Royal Society Interface

Abstract

Soft materials are not only highly deformable, but they also possess rich and diverse body dynamics. Soft body dynamics exhibit a variety of properties, including nonlinearity, elasticity and potentially infinitely many degrees of freedom. Here, we demonstrate that such soft body dynamics can be employed to conduct certain types of computation. Using body dynamics generated from a soft silicone arm, we show that they can be exploited to emulate functions that require memory and to embed robust closed-loop control into the arm. Our results suggest that soft body dynamics have a short-term memory and can serve as a computational resource. This finding paves the way towards exploiting passive body dynamics for control of a large class of underactuated systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsif.2014.0437

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some evidence points to the potential of mechanical properties of the arm to serve a direct computational role.

    “Not only can mechanical properties of the arm facilitate computation, some evidence points to the potential of these properties to serve a direct computational role (Nakajima et al., 2013; Nakajima et al., 2014; Nakajima et al., 2015).”

    From Lessons for Robotics From the Control Architecture of the Octopus (2022) · cites this paper as Nakajima et al., 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nakajima, K., Li, T., Hauser, H., & Pfeifer, R.
Affiliations
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Informatics, University of Zurich, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland
Corresponding author
Nakajima, K.
Venue
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
Published
2014-11-06
Volume
11
Issue
100
Pages
20140437
ISSN
  • 1742-5662 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-5689
OpenAlex
W2964093246
Cited by
128
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of The Royal Society Interface (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Robotic Locomotion and Control
Keywords
soft body dynamics, soft robotics, short-term memory, feedback control, underactuated systems, soft materials, nonlinear elasticity
MeSH terms
Materials Testing, Silicones

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review