Cited by 956Embodied and Extended CognitionPsychiatry, Mental Health, NeuroscienceCybernetics and Technology in Society

How the Body Shapes the Way We Think: A New View of Intelligence

Pfeifer, Rolf, Bongard, Josh·2006·The MIT Press eBooks

Abstract

An exploration of embodied intelligence and its implications points toward a theory of intelligence in general; with case studies of intelligent systems in ubiquitous computing, business and management, human memory, and robotics.How could the body influence our thinking when it seems obvious that the brain controls the body? In How the Body Shapes the Way We Think, Rolf Pfeifer and Josh Bongard demonstrate that thought is not independent of the body but is tightly constrained, and at the same time enabled, by it. They argue that the kinds of thoughts we are capable of have their foundation in our embodiment—in our morphology and the material properties of our bodies.This crucial notion of embodiment underlies fundamental changes in the field of artificial intelligence over the past two decades, and Pfeifer and Bongard use the basic methodology of artificial intelligence—"understanding by building"—to describe their insights. If we understand how to design and build intelligent systems, they reason, we will better understand intelligence in general. In accessible, nontechnical language, and using many examples, they introduce the basic concepts by building on recent developments in robotics, biology, neuroscience, and psychology to outline a possible theory of intelligence. They illustrate applications of such a theory in ubiquitous computing, business and management, and the psychology of human memory. Embodied intelligence, as described by Pfeifer and Bongard, has important…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7551/mitpress/3585.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sensorimotor engagements may promote SOHM formation by providing coherent sources of correlated information, thus affording the possibility of learning even more sophisticated models.

    “Further, these sensorimotor engagements may promote SOHM formation by providing coherent sources of correlated information, thus affording the possibility of learning even more sophisticated models (Pfeifer and Bongard, 2006; Safron, 2019a,c).”

    From An Integrated World Modeling Theory (IWMT) of Consciousness (2020) · cites this paper as Pfeifer and Bongard, 2006

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pfeifer, R., & Bongard, J.
Venue
The MIT Press eBooks
Publisher
The MIT Press
Published
2006
OpenAlex
W4231327205
Cited by
956
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 79 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 51
FWCI
5.80
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The MIT Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
Keywords
embodied AI, embodiment, intelligence theory, body and cognition, morphology, intelligent systems, robotics, ubiquitous computing, human memory, business and management, artificial intelligence, neuroscience, psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review