The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physico-chemical characteristics of evaporating respiratory fluid droplets
Open accessAbstract
The detailed physico-chemical characteristics of respiratory droplets in ambient air, where they are subject to evaporation, are poorly understood. Changes in the concentration and phase of major components in a droplet—salt (NaCl), protein (mucin) and surfactant (dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine)—may affect the viability of any pathogens contained within it and thus may affect the efficiency of transmission of infectious disease by droplets and aerosols. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of relative humidity (RH) on the physico-chemical characteristics of evaporating droplets of model respiratory fluids. We labelled these components in model respiratory fluids and observed evaporating droplets suspended on a superhydrophobic surface using optical and fluorescence microscopy. When exposed to continuously decreasing RH, droplets of different model respiratory fluids assumed different morphologies. Loss of water induced phase separation as well as indication of a decrease in pH. The presence of surfactant inhibited the rapid rehydration of the non-volatile components. An enveloped virus, ϕ 6, that has been proposed as a surrogate for influenza virus appeared to be homogeneously distributed throughout the dried droplet. We hypothesize that the increasing acidity and salinity in evaporating respiratory droplets may affect the structure of the virus, although at low enough RH, crystallization of the droplet components may eliminate their harmful effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Schaffer, F. L., Soergel, M. E., & Straube, D. C. (1976) · Archives of Virology · doi:10.1007/bf01317930 · Cited by 302
Lindsley, W. G., Pearce, T. A., Hudnall, J. B., Davis, K. A., Davis, S. M., Fisher, M. A., Khakoo, R., Palmer, J. E., Clark, K. E., Celik, I., et al. (2012) · Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene · doi:10.1080/15459624.2012.684582 · Cited by 300
Cited by
Airborne transmission of respiratory viruses
Wang, C. C., Prather, K. A., Sznitman, J., Jimenez, J. L., Lakdawala, S. S., Tufekci, Z., & Marr, L. C. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abd9149 · Cited by 1,543
Self-citationVuorinen, V., Aarnio, M., Alava, M., Alopaeus, V., Atanasova, N., Auvinen, M., Balasubramanian, N., Bordbar, H., Erästö, P., Grande, R., et al. (2020) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104866 · Cited by 472
Relative humidity in droplet and airborne transmission of disease
Božič, A., & Kanduč, M. (2021) · Journal of Biological Physics · doi:10.1007/s10867-020-09562-5 · Cited by 142
Indoor Aerosol Science Aspects of SARS-CoV-2 Transmission
Nazaroff, W. W. (2022) · Indoor Air · doi:10.1111/ina.12970 · Cited by 70
Konda, A., Prakash, A., Moss, G. A., Schmoldt, M., Grant, G. D., & Guha, S. (2020) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c04897 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Vejerano, E. P., & Marr, L. C.
- Venue
- Journal of The Royal Society Interface
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 139
- Pages
- 20170939
- ISSN
- 1742-5662 (ISSN-L)
- 1742-5689
- OpenAlex
- W2788518094
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physico-chemical characteristics of evaporating respiratory fluid droplets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rsif.2017.0939
- The paper
- Vejerano, E. P., & Marr, L. C. (2018). Physico-chemical characteristics of evaporating respiratory fluid droplets. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0939
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.