Cited by 141Structural Engineering and Materials AnalysisSustainable Building Design and AssessmentCivil and Structural Engineering Research

Utilization of structural steel in buildings

Open access
Moynihan, Muiris C., Allwood, Julian M.·2014·Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences

Abstract

Over one-quarter of steel produced annually is used in the construction of buildings. Making this steel causes carbon dioxide emissions, which climate change experts recommend be reduced by half in the next 37 years. One option to achieve this is to design and build more efficiently, still delivering the same service from buildings but using less steel to do so. To estimate how much steel could be saved from this option, 23 steel-framed building designs are studied, sourced from leading UK engineering firms. The utilization of each beam is found and buildings are analysed to find patterns. The results for over 10 000 beams show that average utilization is below 50% of their capacity. The primary reason for this low value is ‘rationalization’—providing extra material to reduce labour costs. By designing for minimum material rather than minimum cost, steel use in buildings could be drastically reduced, leading to an equivalent reduction in ‘embodied’ carbon emissions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspa.2014.0170

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Steel structural elements in existing buildings are 40% underutilized.

    “steel structural elements in existing buildings have been found to be 40% underutilized (Moynihan and Allwood 2014).”

    From Reusing Heavy-Section Steel in Buildings: Carbon Reduction Potential and Material Availability (2025) · cites this paper as Moynihan and Allwood 2014

    The Discussion (Evidence for rationalization as the cause of low utilization; page unavailable) estimates that 36% of beam mass could be removed without loss of safety or service, broadly supporting the claim's approximate 40% figure. But this estimate concerns beams in 23 commercially designed UK steel-framed buildings, not all structural elements in existing buildings. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Moynihan and Allwood investigated the design of 23 steel-structured buildings and found that for over 100 00 beams, on average less than half of the loadbearing capacity was being utilized, indicating a substantial scope of savings in steel due to closer specifications and different load-bearing elements.

    “Moynihan and Allwood [71] investigated the design of 23 steel-structured buildings and found that for over 100 00 beams, on average less than half of the loadbearing capacity was being utilized, indicating a substantial scope of savings in steel due to closer specifications and different load-bearing elements.”
  • Light-weight design of buildings can reduce material-related GHG emissions by 19% to 50%.

    “| | Light-weight design | ↓19 [16]-50% [71] | -↑ | ↓ - | MH | ◊ Conventions, labor costs |”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [5]Metz B Davidson OR Bosch PR Dave R Meyer LA 2007 Climate Change 2007: Mitigation: Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moynihan, M. C., & Allwood, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Allwood, Julian M.
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2014-08-08
Volume
470
Issue
2168
Pages
20140170
ISSN
  • 1364-5021 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2946
OpenAlex
W2078220456
Cited by
141
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
6.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/G007217/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Materials Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering Research
Keywords
structural steel, steel frame buildings, embodied carbon, carbon emission reduction, rationalization, material efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review