The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nonlinear information fusion algorithms for data-efficient multi-fidelity modelling
Open accessAbstract
Multi-fidelity modelling enables accurate inference of quantities of interest by synergistically combining realizations of low-cost/low-fidelity models with a small set of high-fidelity observations. This is particularly effective when the low- and high-fidelity models exhibit strong correlations, and can lead to significant computational gains over approaches that solely rely on high-fidelity models. However, in many cases of practical interest, low-fidelity models can only be well correlated to their high-fidelity counterparts for a specific range of input parameters, and potentially return wrong trends and erroneous predictions if probed outside of their validity regime. Here we put forth a probabilistic framework based on Gaussian process regression and nonlinear autoregressive schemes that is capable of learning complex nonlinear and space-dependent cross-correlations between models of variable fidelity, and can effectively safeguard against low-fidelity models that provide wrong trends. This introduces a new class of multi-fidelity information fusion algorithms that provide a fundamental extension to the existing linear autoregressive methodologies, while still maintaining the same algorithmic complexity and overall computational cost. The performance of the proposed methods is tested in several benchmark problems involving both synthetic and real multi-fidelity datasets from computational fluid dynamics simulations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning
Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 · Cited by 11,705
On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization
Liu, D. C., & Nocedal, J. (1989) · Mathematical Programming · doi:10.1007/bf01589116 · Cited by 8,560
Engineering Design via Surrogate Modelling: A Practical Guide
Forrester, A. I. J., Sóbester, A., & Keane, A. J. (2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470770801 · Cited by 2,309
Engineering Design via Surrogate Modelling: A Practical Guide
Keane, A., Forrester, A., & Sobester, A. (2008) · American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics eBooks · doi:10.2514/4.479557 · Cited by 1,686
Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are available
Kennedy, M. (2000) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/87.1.1 · Cited by 1,605
Sparse Gaussian Processes using Pseudo-inputs
Snelson, E., & Ghahramani, Z. (2005) · Cited by 1,415
Active Learning with Statistical Models
Cohn, D. A., Ghahramani, Z., & Jordan, M. I. (1996) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.295 · Cited by 1,317
Information-based objective functions for active data selection
MacKay, D. J. C. (1992) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1992.4.4.590 · Cited by 1,221
Survey of Multifidelity Methods in Uncertainty Propagation, Inference, and Optimization
Peherstorfer, B., Willcox, K., & Gunzburger, M. (2018) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/16m1082469 · Cited by 1,061
RECURSIVE CO-KRIGING MODEL FOR DESIGN OF COMPUTER EXPERIMENTS WITH MULTIPLE LEVELS OF FIDELITY
Le Gratiet, L., & Garnier, J. (2014) · International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification · doi:10.1615/int.j.uncertaintyquantification.2014006914 · Cited by 388
Cited by
Deep learning of vortex-induced vibrations
Raissi, M., Wang, Z., Triantafyllou, M. S., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2019) · Journal of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1017/jfm.2018.872 · Cited by 404
Self-citationMulti-fidelity deep neural network surrogate model for aerodynamic shape optimization
Zhang, X., Xie, F., Ji, T., Zhu, Z., & Zheng, Y. (2021) · Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cma.2020.113485 · Cited by 380
Cheng, S., Quilodrán-Casas, C., Ouala, S., Farchi, A., Liu, C., Tandeo, P., Fablet, R., Lucor, D., Iooss, B., Brajard, J., et al. (2023) · IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica · doi:10.1109/jas.2023.123537 · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- Perdikaris, P., Raissi, M., Damianou, A., Lawrence, N. D., & Karniadakis, G. E.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 473
- Issue
- 2198
- Pages
- 20160751
- ISSN
- 1364-5021 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2946
- OpenAlex
- W2586938721
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 12.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonlinear information fusion algorithms for data-efficient multi-fidelity modelling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspa.2016.0751
- The paper
- Perdikaris, P., Raissi, M., Damianou, A., Lawrence, N. D., & Karniadakis, G. E. (2017). Nonlinear information fusion algorithms for data-efficient multi-fidelity modelling. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2016.0751
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.