The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A quantitative and cytological study of germ cells in human ovaries
Abstract
Foetal, neonatal and post-natal human ovaries (2 months p.c. to 7 years p.p.) were studied with the object of correlating cytological changes in the germ cells with fluctuations in their numbers. The chromosomal configurations of oogonia and oocytes were examined in both histological and squash preparations. The numbers of normal and degenerating germ cells at different developmental stages up to the time of birth were estimated volumetrically, while those in post-natal ovaries were assessed by means of cell counts. Mitotic divisions in oogonia were observed from the end of the 2nd up to the 7th month p.c., a period during which some oocytes had already entered the leptotene and zygotene stages of meiotic prophase. Oocytes at the pachytene stage were recorded from 4 months p.c. until the time of birth, and those at diplotene from the 4th month throughout the remainder of the period studied. The so-called dictyate stage was not observed in human oocytes. Three ‘waves’ of degeneration were observed, affecting (i) oogonia undergoing mitosis (‘atretic divisions’), (ii) oocytes principally at the pachytene stage (‘Z’ cells) and (iii) oocytes at the diplotene stage. The total population of germ cells appears to rise steadily from some 600 000 at 2 months p.c ., reaching a peak of 6 800 000 at 5 months. By the time of birth, the number has declined to 2 000 000 of which some 50 % are atretic. Of the 1 000 000 normal oocytes in the new-born infant, only some 300 000 survive to the age of 7 years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimation of nuclear population from microtome sections
Abercrombie, M. (1946) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.1090940210 · Cited by 4,363
Cited by
Regulation of ovarian follicular development in primates: facts and hypotheses
GOUGEON, A. (1996) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv-17-2-121 · Cited by 1,497
Ovarian aging: mechanisms and clinical consequences
Broekmans, F. J., Soules, M. R., & Fauser, B. C. (2009) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2009-0006 · Cited by 1,248
The variability of female reproductive ageing
te Velde, E. R. (2002) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/8.2.141 · Cited by 1,214
Jenuth, J. P., Peterson, A. C., Fu, K., & Shoubridge, E. A. (1996) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1096-146 · Cited by 591
The ovary: basic biology and clinical implications
Richards, J. S., & Pangas, S. A. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci41350 · Cited by 561
Metadata
- Authors
- Baker, T. G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1963-10-22
- Volume
- 158
- Issue
- 972
- Pages
- 417-433
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 2053-9193
- OpenAlex
- W2075029530
- Cited by
- 1,092
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A quantitative and cytological study of germ cells in human ovaries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.1963.0055
- The paper
- Baker, T. G. (1963). A quantitative and cytological study of germ cells in human ovaries. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1963.0055
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.