Cited by 1,497Reproductive Biology and FertilityOvarian function and disordersReproductive Physiology in Livestock

Regulation of ovarian follicular development in primates: facts and hypotheses

GOUGEON, ALAIN·1996·Endocrine Reviews

Abstract

IN THE adult ovary, folliculogenesis starts when follicles leave the pool of resting follicles (RF) to enter the growth phase. From there, the early growing follicle undergoes a developmental process including a dramatic course of cellular proliferation and differentiation. In primates, only one follicle commonly reaches the preovulatory stage every cycle; most follicles fail to complete this maturation scheme, dying in the process termed atresia. In recent years, a picture has emerged depicting the classic endocrine control of ovarian function by LH and FSH, entangled in a maze of regulatory systems hinging on cell-cell interactions between follicular cells, via action of a variety of molecules (1–3). Different types of cell-cell interactions have been described. In paracrine regulations, a molecule synthesized by one cellular type is released into the interstitial milieu to act directly on another cellular type. In autocrine regulations, molecules synthesized by one cellular type are released to act either on the same tissue (autocrine action), on immediate neighbor cells (juxtacrine action), or are not released and act inside the producing cell itself (intracrine action). These paracrine and autocrine regulations may be involved at every stage of folliculogenesis by acting either alone or by modifying the multiple functions of FSH and LH. Finally, it appears from these findings that during folliculogenesis a finely tuned process of progressive differentiation occurs in all constituents of the follicle.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/edrv-17-2-121

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GOUGEON, A.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
GOUGEON, ALAIN
Venue
Endocrine Reviews
Published
1996-04
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
121-155
ISSN
  • 0163-769X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7189
OpenAlex
W2080700340
Cited by
1,497
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 73
FWCI
50.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Endocrine Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
Keywords
ovarian follicle development, primates, follicular atresia, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, paracrine regulation, autocrine regulation, juxtacrine signaling, intracrine signaling, cell-cell interactions
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Follicular Atresia, Gonadotropins, Ovarian Follicle, Growth Substances, Humans, Ovulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review