Cited by 50Face Recognition and PerceptionEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Are faces of different species perceived categorically by human observers?

Open access
Campbell, R., Pascalis, O., Coleman, M., Wallace, S. B., Benson, P. J.·1997·Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

What are the species boundaries of face processing? Using a face-feature morphing algorithm, image series intermediate between human, monkey (macaque), and bovine faces were constructed. Forced-choice judgement of these images showed sharply bounded categories for upright face images of each species. These predicted the perceptual discrimination boundaries for upright monkey-cow and cow-human images, but not human-monkey images. Species categories were also well-judged for inverted face images, but these did not give sharpened discrimination (categorical perception) at the category boundaries. While categorical species judgements are made reliably, only the distinction between primate faces and cow faces appears to be categorically perceived, and only in upright faces. One inference is that humans may judge monkey faces in terms of human characteristics, albeit distinctive ones.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.1997.0199

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Campbell, R., Pascalis, O., Coleman, M., Wallace, S. B., & Benson, P. J.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, London SE5 8AF, UK
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Campbell, R.
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Published
1997-10-22
Volume
264
Issue
1387
Pages
1429-1434
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2156655989
Cited by
50
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
face perception, categorical perception, species classification, face morphing, upright faces, inverted faces, macaque
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Cattle, Discrimination, Psychological, Face, Humans, Macaca mulatta, Models, Psychological, Neuropsychology, Species Specificity, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review