The maximum oxygen consumption and aerobic scope of birds and mammals: getting to the heart of the matter
Open accessAbstract
Resting or basal metabolic rates, compared across a wide range of organisms, scale with respect to body mass as approximately the 0.75 power. This relationship has recently been linked to the fractal geometry of the appropriate transport system or, in the case of birds and mammals, the blood vascular system. However, the structural features of the blood vascular system should more closely reflect maximal aerobic metabolic rates rather than submaximal function. Thus, the maximal aerobic metabolic rates of birds and mammals should also scale as approximately the 0.75 power. A review of the literature on maximal oxygen consumption and factorial aerobic scope (maximum oxygen consumption divided by basal metabolic rate) suggests that body mass influences the capacity of the cardiovascular system to raise metabolic rates above those at rest. The results show that the maximum sustainable metabolic rates of both birds and mammals are similar and scale as approximately the 0.88 +/- 0.02 power of body mass (and aerobic scope as approximately the 0.15 +/- 0.05 power), when the measurements are standardized with respect to the differences in relative heart mass and haemoglobin concentration between species. The maximum heart beat frequency of birds and mammals is predicted to scale as the -0.12 +/- 0.02 power of body mass, while that at rest should scale as -0.27 +/- 0.04.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The relative mechanical and metabolic capacities of flying animals tend to decline with increasing size.
“the relative mechanical and metabolic capacities of flying animals tend to decline with increasing size”
From The physiology and biomechanics of avian flight at high altitude (2006) · cites this paper as Bishop, 1999
Cites
A General Model for the Origin of Allometric Scaling Laws in Biology
West, G. B., Brown, J. H., & Enquist, B. J. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.276.5309.122 · Cited by 5,016 · see citing works
Scaling: Why is Animal Size so Important?
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1984) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139167826 · Cited by 2,677 · see citing works
Hummingbird flight: Sustaining the highest mass-specific metabolic rates among vertebrates
Suarez, R. K. (1992) · Experientia · doi:10.1007/bf01920240 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Bishop, C. M. (1997) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1997.0032 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Self-citationLimits to vertebrate locomotor energetics suggested by hummingbirds hovering in heliox
Chai, P., & Dudley, R. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/377722a0 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Re-Examination of the “3/4-Law” of Metabolism
DODDS, P. S., ROTHMAN, D. H., & WEITZ, J. S. (2001) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1006/jtbi.2000.2238 · Cited by 589 · see citing works
Global and regional brain metabolic scaling and its functional consequences.
Karbowski, J. (2007) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/1741-7007-5-18 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
The physiology and biomechanics of avian flight at high altitude
Altshuler, D. L. (2006) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icj008 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bishop, C. M.
- Affiliations
- Bangor University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Bishop, Charles M
- ORCID
- Bishop, Charles M
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1999-11-22
- Volume
- 266
- Issue
- 1435
- Pages
- 2275-2281
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- PMC
- PMC1690458
- OpenAlex
- W1994953217
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 0.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Keywords
- VO2max, aerobic scope, basal metabolic rate, allometric scaling, body mass, birds, mammals, cardiovascular system, cardiac mass, hemoglobin levels, fractal geometry, blood vascular system
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Basal Metabolism, Birds, Body Weight, Heart, Mammals, Organ Size, Oxygen Consumption, Species Specificity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review