Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 615

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Warmer springs disrupt the synchrony of oak and winter moth phenology

Open access
Visser, Marcel E., Holleman, Leonard J. M.·2001·Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Spring temperatures have increased over the past 25 years, to which a wide variety of organisms have responded. The outstanding question is whether these responses match the temperature-induced shift of the selection pressures acting on these organisms. Organisms have evolved response mechanisms that are only adaptive given the existing relationship between the cues organisms use and the selection pressures acting on them. Global warming may disrupt ecosystem interactions because it alters these relationships and micro-evolution may be slow in tracking these changes. In particular, such shifts have serious consequences for ecosystem functioning for the tight multitrophic interactions involved in the timing of reproduction and growth. We determined the response of winter moth (Operophtera brumata) egg hatching and oak (Quercus robur) bud burst to temperature, a system with strong selection on synchronization. We show that there has been poor synchrony in recent warm springs, which is due to an increase in spring temperatures without a decrease in the incidence of freezing spells in winter. This is a clear warning that such changes in temperature patterns may affect ecosystem interactions more strongly than changes in mean temperature.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2000.1363

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Baskerville G. L. & Emin P. 1969 Rapid estimation of heat accumulation from maximum and minimum temperatures. Ecology 50 514^517. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Brown J. L. Li S. H. & Bhaga ati N. 1999 Long-term trend toward earlier reeding in an American ird: a response to glo al warming? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96 5565^5569. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Buse A. & Good J. E. G. 1996 Synchronization of larval emergence in winter moth (O ero htera brumata L.) and ud urst in pedunculate oak (Quercus robur L.) under simulated climate change. Ecol. Entomol. 21 335^343. · DOI
  4. Buse A. Good J. E. G. Dury S. & Perrins C. M. 1998 E¡ects of elevated temperature and car on dioxide on the nutritional quality of leaves of oak (Quercus robur L.) as food for the winter moth (O ero htera brumata L.). Funct. Ecol. 12 742^749. · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.1998.00243.x
  5. Buse A., 1999, E¡ects of elevated temperature on multispecies interactions: the case of pedunculate oak, winter moth and tits, Funct. Ecol., 13, 82, 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00010.x · DOI · Paper page
  6. Crick H. Q. P. & Sparks T. H. 1999 Climate change related to egg laying trends. Nature 399 423^424. · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1038/41453 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Dewar R. C. & Watt A. D. 1992 Predicted changes in the synchrony of larval emergence and ud urst under climatic warming. Oecologia 89 557^559. · DOI
  9. Em ree D. G. 1970 The diurnal and seasonal pattern of hatching of winter moths eggs O ero htera brumata (Geometridae: Lepidoptera). Can. Entomol. 102 759^768. · doi:10.4039/ent102759-6
  10. Feeny P. 1970 Seasonal changes in oak leaf tannins and nutrients as a cause of spring feeding y winter moth caterpillars. Ecology 51 565^581. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Harrington R. Woiwood I. & Sparks T. 1999 Climate change and trophic interactions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14 146^150. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Houghton J. T. Meira Filho L. G. Callander B. A. Harris N. Katten erg A. & Maskell K. (ed.) 1996 Climate change 1995öthe science of climate change. Cam ridge University Press.
  13. 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01764-4 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Hunter A. F. & Lechowicz M. J. 1992 Predicting the timing of ud urst in temperate trees. J. A l. Ecol. 29 597^604. · doi:10.2307/2404467
  15. Hurrell J. W. 1995 Decadal trends in the North Atlantic Oscillation: regional temperatures and precipitation. Science 269 676^679. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Kim erling D. N. & Miller J. C. 1988 E¡ects of temperature on larval enclosure of the winter moth O ero htera brumata. Entomol. Ex . A l. 47 249^254. · doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.1988.tb01143.x
  17. Kramer K. 1994 A modeling analysis of the e¡ects of climatic warming on the pro a ility of spring frost damage to tree species in The Netherlands and Germany. Plant Cell Environ. 17 367^377. · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1994.tb00305.x
  18. 10.1038/34073 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Murton R. K. & Westwood N. J. 1977 Avian breeding cycles. London: Oxford University Press.
  20. Nizinski J. J. & Saugier B. 1988 A model of leaf udding and development for a mature Quercus forest. J. A l. Ecol. 25 643^652. · doi:10.2307/2403851
  21. Schiesinger M. E. & Ramankutty N. 1994 An oscillation in the glo al climate system of period 65^70 years. Nature 367 723^726. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Stevenson I. R. & Bryant D. M. 2000 Climate change and constraints on reeding. Nature 406 366^367. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Topp W. & Kirsten K. 1991 Synchronisation of pre-imaginal development and reproductive success in the winter moth O ero htera brumata L. J. A l. Entomol. 111 137^146. · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0418.1991.tb00304.x
  24. Van Dongen S., 1997, Synchronization of hatching date with ud urst of individual host trees (Quercus robur) in the winter moth (O ero htera brumata) and its ¢tness consequences, J. Anim. Ecol., 66
  25. Van Tienderen P. H. & Koelewijn H. P. 1994 Selection on reaction norms genetic correlations and constraints. Genet. Res. Camb. 64 115^125. · DOI
  26. 10.2307/2213 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Visser M. E. Van Noordwijk A. J. Tin ergen J. M. & Lessells C. M. 1998 Warmer springs lead to mis-timed reproduction in great tits (Parus major). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265 1867^1870. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Watt A. D. & McFarlane A. M. 1991 Winter moth on Sitka spruce: synchrony of egg hatch and ud urst and its e¡ect on larval survival. Ecol. Entomol. 16 387^390. · DOI
  29. 10.2307/3677313 · DOI
  30. 10.2307/4564 · doi:10.2307/4564
  31. Wuethrich B. 2000 How climate change alters the rhythms of the wild. Science 287 793^795. · DOI
  32. Zandt H. S. 1994 A comparison of three sampling techniques to estimate the population size of caterpillars in trees. Oecologia 97 399^406. · doi:10.1007/bf00317331

Cited by

See all 615

Metadata

Authors
Visser, M. E., & Holleman, L. J. M.
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Published
2001-02-07
Volume
268
Issue
1464
Pages
289-294
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2021497247
Cited by
615
References
1
FWCI
19.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Warmer springs disrupt the synchrony of oak and winter moth phenology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.2000.1363
The paper
Visser, M. E., & Holleman, L. J. M. (2001). Warmer springs disrupt the synchrony of oak and winter moth phenology. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1363

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.