Cited by 973Marine and fisheries researchAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesPhysiological and biochemical adaptations

Climate and the match or mismatch between predator requirements and resource availability

Open access
Durant, JM, Hjermann, DØ, Ottersen, G, Stenseth, NC·2007·Climate Research

Abstract

Climate influences a population through a variety of processes, including reproduction, growth, migration patterns and phenology.Climate may operate either directly through metabolic and reproductive processes or indirectly through prey, predators, and competitors.One mechanism that may be particularly important, and which is the focus of this review, is the role of climate in affecting the reproductive success of a predator through its effect on the relative timing of food requirement and food availability during early life stages.This principle -the match or mismatch of predators' requirement with resource availability -originated in the marine literature, where it initially referred to how growth and survival of fish larvae (predator) depends on this production being synchronous with that of their main food items, i.e. early stage zooplankton (prey).Here we review how the match/mismatch hypothesis (MMH) is used to describe climate effects on ecological patterns and processes in both marine and terrestrial systems.In addition to studying match/mismatch sensu stricto, we expand on it to include effects of overall production level and the spatial aspect.Possible impacts of climate change on match/mismatch are examined in the context of one of the most apparent effects of global warming: an advancement of spring phenology.As a consequence of different species reacting dissimilarly, even minor changes in climate may invoke non-linear responses unbalancing established patterns of synchrony.All components of a food chain cannot be expected to shift their phenology at the same rate, and thus are unlikely to remain synchronous.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3354/cr033271

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These ecosystem disruptions may be associated with mismatches between physical forcing and the productivity and life cycles of predator and prey.

    “These ecosystem disruptions may be associated with mismatches between physical forcing and the productivity and life cycles of predator and prey [23,84].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Ciannelli L, Dingsør GE, Bogstad B, Ottersen G, Chan KS, Gjøsæter H, Stenseth NC (2007) Spatial anatomy of spe- cies survival rates: effects of predation and climate-driven environmental variability. Ecology (in press)
  2. Crawley MJ, Albon SD, Bazely DR, Milner JM, Pilkington JG, Tuke AL (2004) Vegetation and sheep population dynam- ics. In: Clutton-Brock TH, Pemberton JM (eds) Soay sheep: dynamics and selection in an island population. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 89-112
  3. Cushing DH (1982) Climate and fisheries. Academic Press, London
  4. Cushing DH (1995) Population production and regulation in the sea: a fisheries perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  5. Durant JM, Stenseth NC, Anker-Nilssen T, Harris MP, Thompson P, Wanless S (2004a) Marine birds and climate fluctuation in North Atlantic. In: Stenseth NC, Ottersen G, Hurrell JW, Belgrano A (eds) Marine ecosystems and climate variation: the North Atlantic. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 95-105
  6. Hassol SJ (2004) ACIA, impacts of a warming Arctic: Arctic climate impact assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  7. IPCC (2001) Third assessment report of the Intergovern- mental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  8. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Summary for policy makers. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Inter- governmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
  9. Sinclair M (1988) Marine populations. An essay on population regulation and speciation. University of Washington Press, Seattle

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Durant, J., Hjermann, D., Ottersen, G., & Stenseth, N.
Affiliations
University of Oslo (NO)
Venue
Climate Research
Published
2007-04-20
Volume
33
Pages
271-283
ISSN
  • 0936-577X (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-1572
OpenAlex
W2058444042
Cited by
973
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 91 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 57 · 2012: 42
FWCI
22.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Climate Research (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Norges Forskningsråd
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
Keywords
match-mismatch hypothesis, climate change, phenology, food availability, spring advance, early life stages, marine larvae, zooplankton, food chain, global warming, spatial synchrony, production level

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review