The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prioritizing multiple-use landscapes for conservation: methods for large multi-species planning problems
Abstract
Across large parts of the world, wildlife has to coexist with human activity in highly modified and fragmented landscapes. Combining concepts from population viability analysis and spatial reserve design, this study develops efficient quantitative methods for identifying conservation core areas at large, even national or continental scales. The proposed methods emphasize long-term population persistence, are applicable to both fragmented and natural landscape structures, and produce a hierarchical zonation of regional conservation priority. The methods are applied to both observational data for threatened butterflies at the scale of Britain and modelled probability of occurrence surfaces for indicator species in part of Australia. In both cases, priority landscapes important for conservation management are identified.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most multi-species connectivity efforts have relied on the movement of a limited number of species.
“most efforts have often relied on the movement of a limited number of species (see Appendix 1)”
From Omnidirectional and omnifunctional connectivity analyses with a diverse species pool (2020) · cites this paper as Moilanen et al., 2005
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global Biodiversity Scenarios for the Year 2100
Sala, O. E., Stuart Chapin, F., III, Armesto, J. J., Berlow, E., Bloomfield, J., Dirzo, R., Huber-Sanwald, E., Huenneke, L. F., Jackson, R. B., et al. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5459.1770 · Cited by 9,280
Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change
Warren, M. S., Hill, J. K., Thomas, J. A., Asher, J., Fox, R., Huntley, B., Roy, D. B., Telfer, M. G., Jeffcoate, S., Harding, P., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35102054 · Cited by 1,333
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- Asher J Warren M Fox R Harding P Jeffcoate G Jeffcoate S Greatorex-Davies N& Robert E The millennium atlas of butterflies in Britain and Ireland. 2001 Oxford University Press.
- 10.1093/ee/26.3.473 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.95493.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02125-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/B978-012323448-3/50024-6 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2656.2001.00508.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98081.x · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02704966 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2002.2303 · DOI
- Groombridge B Global biodiversity. 1992 London:Chapman & Hall. · DOI
- 10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00354-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/23876 · DOI
- 10.1038/35008063 · DOI
- Jongman R& Pungetti G. 2004 Cambridge University Press.
- 10.1126/science.281.5382.1513 · DOI
- 10.1086/282900 · DOI
- MacArthur R.H& Wilson E.O The theory of island biogeography. 1967 Princeton University Press.
- 10.1038/35012251 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1131:SCMISE]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/0-387-22648-6_17 · DOI
- 10.1038/365335a0 · DOI
- Sjögren-Gulve P, 2000, Ecological bulletin
- 10.1038/35079066 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature02121 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1095046 · DOI · Paper page
- Tucker G.M& Evans M.I. 2004 Cambridge:Birdlife International.
- UK Biodiversity Steering Group Biodiversity: the UK Steering Group report—meeting the Rio Challenge vol. 1. 1995 London:HMSO.
- 10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0098:UMOMTD]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- Wintle B. A. Elith J. & Potts J. 2005 Fauna habitat modelling and mapping: a case study in the Lower Hunter Central Coast region of NSW. Aust. Ecol. 30 . (In press.). · DOI
- 10.2307/1938423 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data
Elith*, J., H. Graham*, C., P. Anderson, R., Dudík, M., Ferrier, S., Guisan, A., J. Hijmans, R., Huettmann, F., R. Leathwick, J., Lehmann, A., et al. (2006) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x · Cited by 9,088
USING CIRCUIT THEORY TO MODEL CONNECTIVITY IN ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION, AND CONSERVATION
McRae, B. H., Dickson, B. G., Keitt, T. H., & Shah, V. B. (2008) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/07-1861.1 · Cited by 2,244
Conservation biological control and enemy diversity on a landscape scale
Tscharntke, T., Bommarco, R., Clough, Y., Crist, T. O., Kleijn, D., Rand, T. A., Tylianakis, J. M., Nouhuys, S. V., & Vidal, S. (2007) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.08.006 · Cited by 776
Omnidirectional and omnifunctional connectivity analyses with a diverse species pool
Tessier, D. L., Maranger, R., & Poisot, T. (2020) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.02.03.932095 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Moilanen, A., Franco, A. M. A., Early, R. I., Fox, R., Wintle, B., & Thomas, C. D.
- Affiliations
- Metapopulation Research Group, Department of Biological and Environmental SciencesPO Box 65, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Biology, University of YorkYork YO10 5YW, UK
- Butterfly ConservationManor Yard, East Lulworth, Wareham, Dorset BH20 5QP, UK
- Department of Botany, University of MelbourneVictoria 3010, Australia
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2005-08-02
- Volume
- 272
- Issue
- 1575
- Pages
- 1885-1891
- ISSN
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- Cited by
- 480
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
