The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The ties that bind: genetic relatedness predicts the fission and fusion of social groups in wild African elephants
Open accessAbstract
Many social animals live in stable groups. In contrast, African savannah elephants (Loxodonta africana) live in unusually fluid, fission–fusion societies. That is, ‘core’ social groups are composed of predictable sets of individuals; however, over the course of hours or days, these groups may temporarily divide and reunite, or they may fuse with other social groups to form much larger social units. Here, we test the hypothesis that genetic relatedness predicts patterns of group fission and fusion among wild, female African elephants. Our study of a single Kenyan population spans 236 individuals in 45 core social groups, genotyped at 11 microsatellite and one mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) locus. We found that genetic relatedness predicted group fission; adult females remained with their first order maternal relatives when core groups fissioned temporarily. Relatedness also predicted temporary fusion between social groups; core groups were more likely to fuse with each other when the oldest females in each group were genetic relatives. Groups that shared mtDNA haplotypes were also significantly more likely to fuse than groups that did not share mtDNA. Our results suggest that associations between core social groups persist for decades after the original maternal kin have died. We discuss these results in the context of kin selection and its possible role in the evolution of elephant sociality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · Cited by 15,725
Observational study of behavior: sampling methods
Altmann, J. (1974) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/156853974x00534 · Cited by 13,891
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90039-6 · Cited by 4,144
The Evolution of Social Behavior
Alexander, R. D. (1974) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.001545 · Cited by 3,854
The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behavior
Goodall, J. R. (1986) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 3,384
ESTIMATING RELATEDNESS USING GENETIC MARKERS
Queller, D. C., & Goodnight, K. F. (1989) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb04226.x · Cited by 3,032
Group Selection and Kin Selection
SMITH, J. M. (1964) · Nature · doi:10.1038/2011145a0 · Cited by 2,020
Reliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantities using PCR
Taberlet, P. (1996) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/24.16.3189 · Cited by 1,491
The Evolution of Social Behavior by Kin Selection
(1975) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/408298 · Cited by 813
Matriarchs As Repositories of Social Knowledge in African Elephants
McComb, K., Moss, C., Durant, S. M., Baker, L., & Sayialel, S. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1057895 · Cited by 651
Self-citation
Cited by
related: an R package for analysing pairwise relatedness from codominant molecular markers
Pew, J., Muir, P. H., Wang, J., & Frasier, T. R. (2015) · Molecular Ecology Resources · doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12323 · Cited by 408
Kinship and social bonds in female chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)
Langergraber, K., Mitani, J., & Vigilant, L. (2009) · American Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1002/ajp.20711 · Cited by 268
GOBUSH, K. S., MUTAYOBA, B. M., & WASSER, S. K. (2008) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01035.x · Cited by 180
The dynamics of social networks among female Asian elephants
de Silva, S., Ranjeewa, A. D., & Kryazhimskiy, S. (2011) · BMC Ecology · doi:10.1186/1472-6785-11-17 · Cited by 159
The neuroethology of friendship
Brent, L. J. N., Chang, S. W. C., Gariépy, J., & Platt, M. L. (2014) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.12315 · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Archie, E. A., Moss, C. J., & Alberts, S. C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2005-12-06
- Volume
- 273
- Issue
- 1586
- Pages
- 513-522
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W2148296161
- Cited by
- 391
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 13.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The ties that bind: genetic relatedness predicts the fission and fusion of social groups in wild African elephants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.2005.3361
- The paper
- Archie, E. A., Moss, C. J., & Alberts, S. C. (2006). The ties that bind: genetic relatedness predicts the fission and fusion of social groups in wild African elephants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3361
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.