The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The nested structure of a scavenger community
Open accessAbstract
Scavenging is a widespread phenomenon in vertebrate communities which has rarely been accounted for, in spite of playing an essential role in food webs by enhancing nutrient recycling and community stability. Most studies on scavenger assemblages have often presented an oversimplified view of carrion foraging. Here, we applied for the first time the concept of nestedness to the study of a species-rich scavenger community in a forest ecosystem (Białowieża Primeval Forest, Poland) following a network approach. By analysing one of the most complete datasets existing up to now in a pristine environment, we have shown that the community of facultative scavengers is not randomly assembled but highly nested. A nested pattern means that species-poor carcasses support a subset of the scavenger assemblage occurring at progressively species-rich carcasses. This result contradicts the conventional view of facultative scavenging as random and opportunistic and supports recent findings in scavenging ecology. It also suggests that factors other than competition play a major role in determining community structure. Nested patterns in scavenger communities appear to be promoted by the high diversity in carrion resources and consumers, the differential predictability of the ungulate carcass types and stressful environmental conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Factors affecting carcass use by a guild of scavengers in European temperate woodland
Selva, N., Jędrzejewska, B., Jędrzejewski, W., & Wajrak, A. (2005) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z05-158 · Cited by 343
Self-citationWilmers, C. C., Stahler, D. R., Crabtree, R. L., Smith, D. W., & Getz, W. M. (2003) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00522.x · Cited by 271
Stahler, D., Heinrich, B., & Smith, D. (2002) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.2002.3047 · Cited by 136
Cited by
Ecosystem Services Provided by Birds
Whelan, C. J., Wenny, D. G., & Marquis, R. J. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1439.003 · Cited by 988
The Need to Quantify Ecosystem Services Provided by Birds
Wenny, D. G., DeVault, T. L., Johnson, M. D., Kelly, D., H. Sekercioglu, C., Tomback, D. F., & Whelan, C. J. (2011) · The Auk · doi:10.1525/auk.2011.10248 · Cited by 417
The Comparative Effects of Large Carnivores on the Acquisition of Carrion by Scavengers
Allen, M. L., Elbroch, L. M., Wilmers, C. C., & Wittmer, H. U. (2015) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/681004 · Cited by 174
Scavenger community response to the removal of a dominant scavenger
Olson, Z. H., Beasley, J. C., DeVault, T. L., & Rhodes, O. E. (2012) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19771.x · Cited by 88
Ecological role of vertebrate scavengers in urban ecosystems in the UK
Inger, R., Cox, D. T. C., Per, E., Norton, B. A., & Gaston, K. J. (2016) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.2414 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Selva, N., & Fortuna, M. A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2007-02-13
- Volume
- 274
- Issue
- 1613
- Pages
- 1101-1108
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W2121139693
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The nested structure of a scavenger community. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.2006.0232
- The paper
- Selva, N., & Fortuna, M. A. (2007). The nested structure of a scavenger community. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.0232
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.