The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of natural environments in the evolution of resistance traits in pathogenic bacteria
Open accessAbstract
Antibiotics are among the most valuable compounds used for fighting human diseases. Unfortunately, pathogenic bacteria have evolved towards resistance. One important and frequently forgotten aspect of antibiotics and their resistance genes is that they evolved in non-clinical (natural) environments before the use of antibiotics by humans. Given that the biosphere is mainly formed by micro-organisms, learning the functional role of antibiotics and their resistance elements in nature has relevant implications both for human health and from an ecological perspective. Recent works have suggested that some antibiotics may serve for signalling purposes at the low concentrations probably found in natural ecosystems, whereas some antibiotic resistance genes were originally selected in their hosts for metabolic purposes or for signal trafficking. However, the high concentrations of antibiotics released in specific habitats (for instance, clinical settings) as a consequence of human activity can shift those functional roles. The pollution of natural ecosystems by antibiotics and resistance genes might have consequences for the evolution of the microbiosphere. Whereas antibiotics produce transient and usually local challenges in microbial communities, antibiotic resistance genes present in gene-transfer units can spread in nature with consequences for human health and the evolution of environmental microbiota that are largely ignored.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sampling the Antibiotic Resistome
D'Costa, V. M., McGrann, K. M., Hughes, D. W., & Wright, G. D. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1120800 · Cited by 1,594
Overview of Nosocomial Infections Caused by Gram-Negative Bacilli
Weinstein, R. A., Gaynes, R., Edwards, J. R., & System, N. N. I. S. (2005) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/432803 · Cited by 1,404
Clinically Relevant Chromosomally Encoded Multidrug Resistance Efflux Pumps in Bacteria
Piddock, L. J. V. (2006) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.19.2.382-402.2006 · Cited by 1,231
Cited by
Origins and evolution of antibiotic resistance
Davies, J., & Davies, D. (2010) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00016-10 · Cited by 5,784
Antibiotic resistance in the environment
Larsson, D. G. J., & Flach, C.-F. (2022) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-021-00649-x · Cited by 3,164
Polyphenols as antimicrobial agents
Daglia, M. (2012) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2011.08.007 · Cited by 1,637
Challenges of Antibacterial Discovery
Silver, L. L. (2011) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00030-10 · Cited by 1,376
Wellington, E. M., Boxall, A. B., Cross, P., Feil, E. J., Gaze, W. H., Hawkey, P. M., Johnson-Rollings, A. S., Jones, D. L., Lee, N. M., Otten, W., et al. (2013) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(12)70317-1 · Cited by 1,122
Metadata
- Authors
- Martinez, J. L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2009-04-08
- Volume
- 276
- Issue
- 1667
- Pages
- 2521-2530
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- OpenAlex
- W2105379169
- Cited by
- 513
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 26.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The role of natural environments in the evolution of resistance traits in pathogenic bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.2009.0320
- The paper
- Martinez, J. L. (2009). The role of natural environments in the evolution of resistance traits in pathogenic bacteria. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.0320
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.