Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 507

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The sixth mass coextinction: are most endangered species parasites and mutualists?

Open access
Dunn, Robert R., Harris, Nyeema C., Colwell, Robert K., Koh, Lian Pin, Sodhi, Navjot S.·2009·Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

The effects of species declines and extinction on biotic interactions remain poorly understood. The loss of a species is expected to result in the loss of other species that depend on it (coextinction), leading to cascading effects across trophic levels. Such effects are likely to be most severe in mutualistic and parasitic interactions. Indeed, models suggest that coextinction may be the most common form of biodiversity loss. Paradoxically, few historical or contemporary coextinction events have actually been recorded. We review the current knowledge of coextinction by: (i) considering plausible explanations for the discrepancy between predicted and observed coextinction rates; (ii) exploring the potential consequences of coextinctions; (iii) discussing the interactions and synergies between coextinction and other drivers of species loss, particularly climate change; and (iv) suggesting the way forward for understanding the phenomenon of coextinction, which may well be the most insidious threat to global biodiversity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2009.0413

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.1093/aesa/92.5.675 · doi:10.1093/aesa/92.5.675
  2. Darwin C., 1862, The various contrivances by which orchids are fertilized by orchids.
  3. Dunn R. R., 2002, On parasites lost-and found: passenger pigeon lice rediscovered, Wild Earth, 12, 28
  4. Dunn R. R., Holocene extinctions
  5. 10.1098/rspb.2001.1667 · doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1667
  6. Price R. D., 1996, Revision of the chewing louse genus Formicaphagus (Phthiraptera: Philopteridae) from Neotropical antbirds and gnateaters (Aves: Passeriformes), J. Kansas Entomol. Soc., 69, 346
  7. Price R. D., 2000, Pigeon lice down under: taxonomy of Australian Campanulotes (Phthiraptera: Philopteridae), with a description of C. durdeni n. sp, J. Parasitol., 86, 948
  8. 10.2317/0602.14.1 · doi:10.2317/0602.14.1
  9. 10.1038/366307a0 · doi:10.1038/366307a0
  10. 10.1017/S0030605306000123 · doi:10.1017/s0030605306000123
  11. 10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00297.x · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00297.x

Cited by

See all 507

Metadata

Authors
Dunn, R. R., Harris, N. C., Colwell, R. K., Koh, L. P., & Sodhi, N. S.
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2009-05-27
Volume
276
Issue
1670
Pages
3037-3045
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2119385832
Cited by
507
References
59
FWCI
20.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
royalsociety.org/journals/ethics-policies/data-sharing-mining/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The sixth mass coextinction: are most endangered species parasites and mutualists? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.2009.0413
The paper
Dunn, R. R., Harris, N. C., Colwell, R. K., Koh, L. P., & Sodhi, N. S. (2009). The sixth mass coextinction: are most endangered species parasites and mutualists? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.0413

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.