The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exposure to visual cues of pathogen contagion changes preferences for masculinity and symmetry in opposite-sex faces
Open accessAbstract
Evolutionary approaches to human attractiveness have documented several traits that are proposed to be attractive across individuals and cultures, although both cross-individual and cross-cultural variations are also often found. Previous studies show that parasite prevalence and mortality/health are related to cultural variation in preferences for attractive traits. Visual experience of pathogen cues may mediate such variable preferences. Here we showed individuals slideshows of images with cues to low and high pathogen prevalence and measured their visual preferences for face traits. We found that both men and women moderated their preferences for facial masculinity and symmetry according to recent experience of visual cues to environmental pathogens. Change in preferences was seen mainly for opposite-sex faces, with women preferring more masculine and more symmetric male faces and men preferring more feminine and more symmetric female faces after exposure to pathogen cues than when not exposed to such cues. Cues to environmental pathogens had no significant effects on preferences for same-sex faces. These data complement studies of cross-cultural differences in preferences by suggesting a mechanism for variation in mate preferences. Similar visual experience could lead to within-cultural agreement and differing visual experience could lead to cross-cultural variation. Overall, our data demonstrate that preferences can be strategically flexible according to recent visual experience with pathogen cues. Given that cues to pathogens may signal an increase in contagion/mortality risk, it may be adaptive to shift visual preferences in favour of proposed good-gene markers in environments where such cues are more evident.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“we have also found that viewing cues to disease salience increased preferences for facial cues of long-term health in potential mates, but not same-sex individuals (Little et al. 2011).”
From Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity (2012) · cites this paper as Little et al. 2011
In the citing paper
“This relationship is consistent with a wide range of additional evidence indicating that individuals are sensitive to disease-connoting cues within their immediate environment, and respond to these cues with functionally adaptive shifts in cognition and behavior [58], [59].”
From Pathogens and Politics: Further Evidence That Parasite Prevalence Predicts Authoritarianism (2013) · cites this paper as [58]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parasites, Bright Males, and the Immunocompetence Handicap
Folstad, I., & Karter, A. J. (1992) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285346 · Cited by 2,799
Belsky, J., Steinberg, L. D., & Draper, P. (1991) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01558.x · Cited by 2,601
Belsky, J., Steinberg, L., & Draper, P. (1991) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1131166 · Cited by 1,780
Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness
Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton‐Voak, I. S., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., Henzi, S. P., Castles, D. L., & Akamatsu, S. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/29772 · Cited by 1,359
Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (1994) · Journal of Comparative Psychology · doi:10.1037/0735-7036.108.3.233 · Cited by 1,110
Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (1999) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01403-5 · Cited by 950
Evidence that disgust evolved to protect from risk of disease
Curtis, V., Aunger, R., & Rabie, T. (2004) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2003.0144 · Cited by 842
Ache Life History: The Ecology and Demography of a Foraging People.
Howell, N. E., Hill, K. R., & Hurtado, A. M. (1996) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.2307/2137817 · Cited by 841
Prototyping and Transforming Facial Textures for Perception Research
Tiddeman, B. P., Burt, M., & Perrett, D. (2001) · IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications · doi:10.1109/38.946630 · Cited by 838
Menstrual cycle alters face preference
Penton‐Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I., Castles, D. L., Kobayashi, T., Burt, D. M., Murray, L. K., & Minamisawa, R. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/21557 · Cited by 836
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.61 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R. (2012) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x11000021 · Cited by 530
Murray, D. R., & Schaller, M. (2016) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.09.002 · Cited by 282
Danger, Disease, and the Nature of Prejudice(s)
Schaller, M., & Neuberg, S. L. (2012) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-394281-4.00001-5 · Cited by 280
The behavioral immune system: Current concerns and future directions
Ackerman, J. M., Hill, S. E., & Murray, D. R. (2018) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12371 · Cited by 268
Sexual Selection on Human Faces and Voices
Puts, D. A., Jones, B. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2012) · The Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224499.2012.658924 · Cited by 212
Metadata
- Authors
- Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Stirling (GB)
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Little, Anthony C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 278
- Issue
- 1714
- Pages
- 2032-2039
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- PMC
- PMC3107643
- OpenAlex
- W2136596950
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 15.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (acceptedVersion)
- Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Keywords
- parasite prevalence, mate preferences, facial masculinity, facial symmetry, facial attractiveness, visual experience, cross-cultural variation, mate choice, evolutionary psychology
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Communicable Diseases, Cues, Face, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sexual Behavior, Sex Characteristics, Visual Perception, Young Adult, Femininity, Masculinity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
