Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 241

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Latitude, elevational climatic zonation and speciation in New World vertebrates

Open access
Cadena, Carlos Daniel, Kozak, Kenneth H., Gómez, Juan Pablo, Parra, Juan Luis, McCain, Christy M., Bowie, Rauri C. K., Carnaval, Ana C., Moritz, Craig, Rahbek, Carsten, Roberts, Trina E., Sanders, Nathan J., Schneider, Christopher J., VanDerWal, Jeremy, Zamudio, Kelly R., Graham, Catherine H.·2012·Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Many biodiversity hotspots are located in montane regions, especially in the tropics. A possible explanation for this pattern is that the narrow thermal tolerances of tropical species and greater climatic stratification of tropical mountains create more opportunities for climate-associated parapatric or allopatric speciation in the tropics relative to the temperate zone. However, it is unclear whether a general relationship exists among latitude, climatic zonation and the ecology of speciation. Recent taxon-specific studies obtained different results regarding the role of climate in speciation in tropical versus temperate areas. Here, we quantify overlap in the climatic distributions of 93 pairs of sister species of mammals, birds, amphibians and reptiles restricted to either the New World tropics or to the Northern temperate zone. We show that elevational ranges of tropical- and temperate-zone species do not differ from one another, yet the temperature range experienced by species in the temperate zone is greater than for those in the tropics. Moreover, tropical sister species tend to exhibit greater similarity in their climatic distributions than temperate sister species. This pattern suggests that evolutionary conservatism in the thermal niches of tropical taxa, coupled with the greater thermal zonation of tropical mountains, may result in increased opportunities for allopatric isolation, speciation and the accumulation of species in tropical montane regions. Our study exemplifies the power of combining phylogenetic and spatial datasets of global climatic variation to explore evolutionary (rather than purely ecological) explanations for the high biodiversity of tropical montane regions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2011.0720

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 241

Metadata

Authors
Cadena, C. D., Kozak, K. H., Gómez, J. P., Parra, J. L., McCain, C. M., Bowie, R. C. K., Carnaval, A. C., Moritz, C., Rahbek, C., Roberts, T. E., Sanders, N. J., Schneider, C. J., VanDerWal, J., Zamudio, K. R., & Graham, C. H.
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2011-06
Volume
279
Issue
1726
Pages
194-201
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2165768109
Cited by
241
References
5
FWCI
9.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Latitude, elevational climatic zonation and speciation in New World vertebrates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.2011.0720
The paper
Cadena, C. D., Kozak, K. H., Gómez, J. P., Parra, J. L., McCain, C. M., Bowie, R. C. K., Carnaval, A. C., Moritz, C., Rahbek, C., Roberts, T. E., Sanders, N. J., Schneider, C. J., VanDerWal, J., Zamudio, K. R., & Graham, C. H. (2012). Latitude, elevational climatic zonation and speciation in New World vertebrates. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.0720

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.