Elucidating the significance of spatial memory on movement decisions by African savannah elephants using state–space models
Open accessAbstract
Spatial memory facilitates resource acquisition where resources are patchy, but how it influences movement behaviour of wide-ranging species remains to be resolved. We examined African elephant spatial memory reflected in movement decisions regarding access to perennial waterholes. State–space models of movement data revealed a rapid, highly directional movement behaviour almost exclusively associated with visiting perennial water. Behavioural change point (BCP) analyses demonstrated that these goal-oriented movements were initiated on average 4.59 km, and up to 49.97 km, from the visited waterhole, with the closest waterhole accessed 90% of the time. Distances of decision points increased when switching to different waterholes, during the dry season, or for female groups relative to males, while selection of the closest waterhole decreased when switching. Overall, our analyses indicated detailed spatial knowledge over large scales, enabling elephants to minimize travel distance through highly directional movement when accessing water. We discuss the likely cognitive and socioecological mechanisms driving these spatially precise movements that are most consistent with our findings. By applying modern analytic techniques to high-resolution movement data, this study illustrates emerging approaches for studying how cognition structures animal movement behaviour in different ecological and social contexts.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Elephants migrate long distances in search of resources that are distributed in patches throughout the environment.
“elephants migrate long distances in search of resources that are distributed in patches throughout the environment (de Knegt et al., 2011; Moss, 1992; Polansky et al., 2015; Tsalyuk et al., 2019)”
From Do elephants really never forget? What we know about elephant memory and a call for further investigation (2025) · cites this paper as Polansky et al., 2015
The only three studies that directly investigate memory in wild elephants were conducted on African savanna elephants.
“Indeed, to our knowledge, the only three studies that directly investigate memory in wild elephants were conducted on African savanna elephants (Polansky et al., 2015; Presotto et al., 2019; Tsalyuk et al., 2019).”
From Do elephants really never forget? What we know about elephant memory and a call for further investigation (2025) · cites this paper as Polansky et al., 2015
Elephants, when thirsty, determine the location of the nearest water hole and move straight to it from a distance of 5 to 50 km.
“For example, elephants, when thirsty, manage to determine the location of the nearest water hole and move straight to it, from a distance of 5 to 50 km ( 19 ).”
From What is consciousness, and could machines have it? (2017) · cites this paper as [19]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What is consciousness, and could machines have it?
Dehaene, S., Lau, H., & Kouider, S. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aan8871 · Cited by 855 · see citing works
Presotto, A., Fayrer-Hosken, R., Curry, C., & Madden, M. (2019) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-019-01242-9 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Aging: What We Can Learn From Elephants
Chusyd, D. E., Ackermans, N. L., Austad, S. N., Hof, P. R., Mielke, M. M., Sherwood, C. C., & Allison, D. B. (2021) · Frontiers in Aging · doi:10.3389/fragi.2021.726714 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Hope, S. F., Willgohs, K. R., Dittakul, S., & Plotnik, J. M. (2025) · Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/s13420-024-00655-y · Cited by 8 · see citing works
All roads lead to Rome, even in African savannah elephants—or do they?
Bohbot, V. D. (2015) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.0473 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Polansky, L., Kilian, W., & Wittemyer, G.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Etosha Ecological Institute (NA)
- Save the Elephants (KE)
- Corresponding author
- Polansky, Leo
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2015-04-22
- Volume
- 282
- Issue
- 1805
- Pages
- 20143042
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- PMC
- PMC4389615
- OpenAlex
- W2136328646
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 10.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
- Keywords
- spatial memory, Loxodonta africana, state-space model, directional motion, travel distance minimization, sex differences, seasonal variation, animal cognition, savannah elephant
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Decision Making, Elephants, Female, Hippocampus, Male, Markov Chains, Models, Biological, Movement, Namibia, Seasons, Geographic Information Systems, Spatial Memory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review