Cited by 34Wildlife Ecology and ConservationSpatial Cognition and NavigationPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Spatial mapping shows that some African elephants use cognitive maps to navigate the core but not the periphery of their home ranges

Open access
Presotto, Andrea, Fayrer-Hosken, Richard, Curry, Caitlin, Madden, Marguerite·2019·Animal Cognition

Abstract

Strategies of navigation have been shown to play a critical role when animals revisit resource sites across large home ranges. The habitual route system appears to be a sufficient strategy for animals to navigate while avoiding the cognitive cost of traveling using the Euclidean map. We hypothesize that wild elephants travel more frequently using habitual routes to revisit resource sites as opposed to using the Euclidean map. To identify the elephants' habitual routes, we created a python script, which accounted for frequently used route segments that constituted the habitual routes. Results showed elephant navigation flexibility traveling at Kruger National Park landscape. Elephants shift strategies of navigation depend on the familiarity of their surroundings. In the core area of their home range, elephants traveled using the Euclidean map, but intraindividual differences showed that elephants were then converted to habitual routes when navigating within the less familiar periphery of their home range. These findings are analogous to the recent experimental results found in smaller mammals that showed that rats encode locations according to their familiarity with their surroundings. In addition, as recently observed in monkeys, intersections of habitual routes are important locations used by elephants when making navigation decisions. We found a strong association between intersections and new segment usage by elephants when they revisit resource sites, suggesting that intersection choice may contribute to the spatial representations elephants use when repeatedly revisiting resource sites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10071-019-01242-9

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The only three studies that directly investigate memory in wild elephants were conducted on African savanna elephants.

    “Indeed, to our knowledge, the only three studies that directly investigate memory in wild elephants were conducted on African savanna elephants (Polansky et al., 2015; Presotto et al., 2019; Tsalyuk et al., 2019).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Presotto, A., Fayrer-Hosken, R., Curry, C., & Madden, M.
Affiliations
  • San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research (US)
  • Salisbury University (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
Venue
Animal Cognition
Published
2019-01-28
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
251-263
ISSN
  • 1435-9448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-9456
OpenAlex
W2911886592
Cited by
33
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Animal Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Repository at the University of Maryland (University of Maryland College Park)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
Loxodonta africana, navigation strategies, cognitive maps, home range, spatial memory, within-person variability, spatial representation, Kruger National Park
MeSH terms
Animals, Cognition, Elephants, Homing Behavior, Ecosystem, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review