Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 878

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interactions among ecosystem stressors and their importance in conservation

Open access
Côté, Isabelle M., Darling, Emily S., Brown, Christopher J.·2016·Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Interactions between multiple ecosystem stressors are expected to jeopardize biological processes, functions and biodiversity. The scientific community has declared stressor interactions—notably synergies—a key issue for conservation and management. Here, we review ecological literature over the past four decades to evaluate trends in the reporting of ecological interactions (synergies, antagonisms and additive effects) and highlight the implications and importance to conservation. Despite increasing popularity, and ever-finer terminologies, we find that synergies are (still) not the most prevalent type of interaction, and that conservation practitioners need to appreciate and manage for all interaction outcomes, including antagonistic and additive effects. However, it will not be possible to identify the effect of every interaction on every organism's physiology and every ecosystem function because the number of stressors, and their potential interactions, are growing rapidly. Predicting the type of interactions may be possible in the near-future, using meta-analyses, conservation-oriented experiments and adaptive monitoring. Pending a general framework for predicting interactions, conservation management should enact interventions that are robust to uncertainty in interaction type and that continue to bolster biological resilience in a stressful world.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2015.2592

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. 10.1111/cobi.12332 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/ncomms8615 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1126/science.1187512 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1007/s13280-011-0185-x · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.009 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.tree.2008.03.011 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1007/s100219900049 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021103.105711 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01336.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.3354/meps10121 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.4319/lo.1999.44.3_part_2.0864 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1002/ece3.1465 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01253.x · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.2307/3565987 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01437-2 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.13255.x · DOI · Paper page
  17. Fagan WF, 2006, Quantifying the extinction vortex, Ecol. Lett, 9, 51, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00845.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.tree.2007.07.001 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1111/gcb.12833 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1111/gcb.12453 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1002/ece3.516 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.10.067 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01192.x · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1890/15-0171.1 · DOI
  25. 10.1111/gcb.12619 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1098/rspb.2012.2756 · DOI
  27. 10.1139/X10-127 · DOI
  28. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02302.x · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02745.x · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1016/B978-0-12-385536-7.00002-9 · DOI
  31. 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[3128:HVNCOM]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1093/biosci/biu198 · DOI
  33. 10.1371/journal.pone.0065765 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1111/ddi.12159 · DOI
  35. 10.3390/w5041653 · DOI
  36. 10.1038/nature04366 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01847.x · DOI
  38. 10.1111/1365-2664.12019 · DOI
  39. 10.4319/lo.2007.52.2.0716 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1371/journal.pone.0120837 · DOI
  41. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000438 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1007/s00338-014-1199-1 · DOI
  43. 10.3389/fmars.2015.00009 · DOI
  44. 10.1002/ece3.516 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1111/gcb.12191 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01592.x · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.11.028 · DOI
  48. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02656.x · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1995.tb01133.x · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1995.tb01133.x
  50. 10.1038/nclimate2441 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1038/nclimate2682 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.005 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00089.x · DOI
  54. 10.1098/rstb.2013.0267 · DOI

Cited by

See all 878

Metadata

Authors
Côté, I. M., Darling, E. S., & Brown, C. J.
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2016-02-10
Volume
283
Issue
1824
Pages
20152592
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2265312118
Cited by
878
References
3
FWCI
54.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
royalsociety.org/journals/ethics-policies/data-sharing-mining/ (tdm)
Funders
  • Griffith University
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • SFU/Griffith University Collaborative Travel Grant
  • Cedartree Foundation (David H. Smith Conservation Research Fellowship)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interactions among ecosystem stressors and their importance in conservation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rspb.2015.2592
The paper
Côté, I. M., Darling, E. S., & Brown, C. J. (2016). Interactions among ecosystem stressors and their importance in conservation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2592

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.