Cited by 181Research Data Management PracticesScientific Computing and Data ManagementMorphological variations and asymmetry

Open data and digital morphology

Open access
Davies, Thomas G., Rahman, Imran A., Lautenschlager, Stephan, Cunningham, John A., Asher, Robert J., Barrett, Paul M., Bates, Karl T., Bengtson, Stefan +37 more·2017·Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Over the past two decades, the development of methods for visualizing and analysing specimens digitally, in three and even four dimensions, has transformed the study of living and fossil organisms. However, the initial promise that the widespread application of such methods would facilitate access to the underlying digital data has not been fully achieved. The underlying datasets for many published studies are not readily or freely available, introducing a barrier to verification and reproducibility, and the reuse of data. There is no current agreement or policy on the amount and type of data that should be made available alongside studies that use, and in some cases are wholly reliant on, digital morphology. Here, we propose a set of recommendations for minimum standards and additional best practice for three-dimensional digital data publication, and review the issues around data storage, management and accessibility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2017.0194

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data availability represents a formidable challenge because datasets are often not openly available after publication.

    “data availability represents a formidable challenge because datasets are often not openly available after publication 8”

    From High-throughput phenomics of global ant biodiversity (2026) · cites this paper as [8]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davies, T. G., Rahman, I. A., Lautenschlager, S., Cunningham, J. A., Asher, R. J., Barrett, P. M., Bates, K. T., Bengtson, S., Benson, R. B. J., Boyer, D. M., Braga, J., Bright, J. A., Claessens, L. P. A. M., Cox, P. G., Dong, X.-P., Evans, A. R., Falkingham, P. L., Friedman, M., Garwood, R. J., Goswami, A., Hutchinson, J. R., Jeffery, N. S., Johanson, Z., Lebrun, R., Martínez-Pérez, C., Marugán-Lobón, J., O'Higgins, P. M., Metscher, B., Orliac, M., Rowe, T. B., Rücklin, M., Sánchez-Villagra, M. R., Shubin, N. H., Smith, S. Y., Starck, J. M., Stringer, C., Summers, A. P., Sutton, M. D., Walsh, S. A., Weisbecker, V., Witmer, L. M., Wroe, S., Yin, Z., Rayfield, E. J., & Donoghue, P. C. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Natural History Museum (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • Swedish Museum of Natural History (SE)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Dept. Evolutionary Anthropology, Duke University, PO Box 90383, Biological Sciences Building, 130 Science Drive, Durham, NC 27708, USA
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • College of the Holy Cross (US)
  • University of York (GB)
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University College London (GB)
  • Royal Veterinary College (GB)
  • Université de Montpellier (FR)
  • School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK
  • Unidad de Paleontología, Dpto. Biología, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Cantoblanco, Spain
  • Dept. Archaeology and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK
  • University of Vienna (AT)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Naturalis Biodiversity Center (NL)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • National Museums Scotland (GB)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Ohio University (US)
  • University of New England (AU)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Rayfield, Emily J.
  • Donoghue, Philip C. J.
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2017-04-12
Volume
284
Issue
1852
Pages
20170194
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2599500331
Cited by
181
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 14 · 2015: 1
FWCI
7.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • National Museums Scotland Repository (acceptedVersion)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DORA PSI (Paul Scherrer Institute) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RVC Research Online (Royal Veterinary College) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Natural History Museum, London (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • Royal Commission for the Exhibition of 1851
  • H2020 European Research Council
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • The Calleva Foundation
  • Leverhulme Trust
  • Human Origins Research Fund
  • National Science Foundation
  • Royal Society
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
Keywords
open data, digital morphology, data accessibility, data storage and management, reproducibility, data reuse, data sharing policy, fossil specimen
MeSH terms
Biological Science Disciplines, Research, Reproducibility of Results, Datasets as Topic, Data Curation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review