Cited by 1,086Advanced X-ray Imaging TechniquesComparative Animal Anatomy StudiesAdvanced X-ray and CT Imaging

MicroCT for comparative morphology: simple staining methods allow high-contrast 3D imaging of diverse non-mineralized animal tissues

Open access
Metscher, Brian D·2009·BMC Physiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Comparative, functional, and developmental studies of animal morphology require accurate visualization of three-dimensional structures, but few widely applicable methods exist for non-destructive whole-volume imaging of animal tissues. Quantitative studies in particular require accurately aligned and calibrated volume images of animal structures. X-ray microtomography (microCT) has the potential to produce quantitative 3D images of small biological samples, but its widespread use for non-mineralized tissues has been limited by the low x-ray contrast of soft tissues. Although osmium staining and a few other techniques have been used for contrast enhancement, generally useful methods for microCT imaging for comparative morphology are still lacking. RESULTS: Several very simple and versatile staining methods are presented for microCT imaging of animal soft tissues, along with advice on tissue fixation and sample preparation. The stains, based on inorganic iodine and phosphotungstic acid, are easier to handle and much less toxic than osmium, and they produce high-contrast x-ray images of a wide variety of soft tissues. The breadth of possible applications is illustrated with a few microCT images of model and non-model animals, including volume and section images of vertebrates, embryos, insects, and other invertebrates. Each image dataset contains x-ray absorbance values for every point in the imaged volume, and objects as small as individual muscle fibers and single blood cells can be resolved in their original locations and orientations within the sample. CONCLUSION: With very simple contrast staining, microCT imaging can produce quantitative, high-resolution, high-contrast volume images of animal soft tissues, without destroying the specimens and with possibilities of combining with other preparation and imaging methods. Such images are expected to be useful in comparative, developmental, functional, and quantitative studies of morphology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-6793-9-11

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • To image insects with conventional micro-CT, staining and/or drying is often required to discriminate between tissues.

    “to image insects with conventional micro-CT, staining and/or drying is often required to discriminate between tissues 16 – 19”

    From High-throughput phenomics of global ant biodiversity (2026) · cites this paper as [17]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Metscher, B. D.
Affiliations
University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Metscher, Brian D
Venue
BMC Physiology
Published
2009
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
11
ISSN
1472-6793 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161247859
Cited by
1,086
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 101 · 2018: 96 · 2017: 88 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 29
FWCI
22.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Physiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Phaidra (Universität Wien) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Universität Wien
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
Keywords
X-ray microtomography, staining techniques, phosphotungstic acid, comparative morphology, tissue fixation, sample preparation, invertebrate morphology, muscle fibers, blood cells
MeSH terms
Animals, Contrast Media, Iodine, Minerals, Phosphotungstic Acid, Radiographic Image Enhancement, Staining and Labeling, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review