The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A fossil protein chimera; difficulties in discriminating dinosaur peptide sequences from modern cross-contamination
Abstract
A decade ago, reports that organic-rich soft tissue survived from dinosaur fossils were apparently supported by proteomics-derived sequence information of exceptionally well-preserved bone. This initial claim to the sequencing of endogenous collagen peptides from an approximately 68 Myr Tyrannosaurus rex fossil was highly controversial, largely on the grounds of potential contamination from either bacterial biofilms or from laboratory practice. In a subsequent study, collagen peptide sequences from an approximately 78 Myr Brachylophosaurus canadensis fossil were reported that have remained largely unchallenged. However, the endogeneity of these sequences relies heavily on a single peptide sequence, apparently unique to both dinosaurs. Given the potential for cross-contamination from modern bone analysed by the same team, here we extract collagen from bone samples of three individuals of ostrich, Struthio camelus . The resulting LC–MS/MS data were found to match all of the proposed sequences for both the original Tyrannosaurus and Brachylophosaurus studies. Regardless of the true nature of the dinosaur peptides, our finding highlights the difficulty of differentiating such sequences with confidence. Our results not only imply that cross-contamination cannot be ruled out, but that appropriate measures to test for endogeneity should be further evaluated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The survival of ancient proteins in deep time has been linked to mineralized substrates.
“what is known is that the survival of ancient proteins in deep time has been linked to mineralized substrates.”
From Ancient protein analysis in archaeology (2021) · cites this paper as [69]
The Introduction (page unavailable) links mineralized hadrosaur tissue with possible persistence of organic material. It says the evidence was for protein breakdown products, not surviving protein sequences, so it does not establish the claimed link between mineralized substrates and the survival of ancient proteins. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A comprehensive phylogeny of birds (Aves) using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing
Prum, R. O., Berv, J. S., Dornburg, A., Field, D. J., Townsend, J. P., Lemmon, E. M., & Lemmon, A. R. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15697 · Cited by 1,668
A comprehensive phylogeny of birds (Aves) using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing
Prum, R. O., Berv, J. S., Dornburg, A., Field, D. J., Townsend, J. P., Lemmon, E. M., & Lemmon, A. R. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature19417 · Cited by 928 · cited 1×
“being earliest diverging from the extant bird lineage [23], this became no longer possible.”
BackgroundFossil proteins in vertebrate calcified tissues,
Armstrong, W. G., Halstead, L. B., Reed, F. B., & Wood, L. (1983) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1983.0026 · Cited by 70
Biomolecules in fossil remains: multidisciplinary approach to endurance
Nielsen-Marsh, C. (2002) · The Biochemist · doi:10.1042/bio02403012 · Cited by 43 · cited 1×
“[1] reported on the startling discovery of soft-tissue preservation in the femur of a Tyrannosaurus rex, apparently preserved for over 68 Myr, a length of time vastly greater than thought possible given the experimentally measured rates of decay for the component structural proteins, particularly collagen [2].”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- 10.1126/science.1108397 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1154284 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1137614 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1147046 · DOI · Paper page
- Manning PL, 2009, Mineralized soft-tissue structure and chemistry in a mummified hadrosaur from the Hell Creek Formation, North Dakota (USA), Proc. R. Soc. B, 273, 2777
- 10.1002/ajpa.1330860308 · DOI
- 10.1021/pr900349r · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0002808 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1155006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/pr200721u · DOI
- 10.1002/rcm.6821 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1165069 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jas.2009.08.020 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/rcm.7445 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature12323 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rspb.2015.0015 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00675 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0013334 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0020381 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00873 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.bone.2012.10.010 · DOI
- 10.1111/bor.12225 · DOI · Paper page
- Buckley M Warwood S Kitchener AC Manning PL. 2017 Data from: A fossil protein chimera; difficulties in discriminating dinosaur peptide sequences from modern cross-contamination. PRIDE Proteomics Data Repository. (doi:10.6019/PXD006360) · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A guide to ancient protein studies
Hendy, J., Welker, F., Demarchi, B., Speller, C., Warinner, C., & Collins, M. J. (2018) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-018-0510-x · Cited by 291
Ancient protein analysis in archaeology
Hendy, J. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb9314 · Cited by 161
Saitta, E. T., Liang, R., Lau, M. C., Brown, C. M., Longrich, N. R., Kaye, T. G., Novak, B. J., Salzberg, S. L., Norell, M. A., Abbott, G. D., et al. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.46205 · Cited by 67
Early Pleistocene enamel proteome sequences from Dmanisi resolve Stephanorhinus phylogeny
Cappellini, E., Welker, F., Pandolfi, L., Madrigal, J. R., Fotakis, A. K., Lyon, D., Moreno Mayar, V. J., Bukhsianidze, M., Jersie-Christensen, R. R., Mackie, M., et al. (2018) · doi:10.1101/407692 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Buckley, M., Warwood, S., van Dongen, B., Kitchener, A. C., & Manning, P. L.
- Affiliations
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, Manchester M1 7DN, UK
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Michael Smith Building, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
- School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Interdisciplinary Centre for Ancient Life, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
- Department of Natural Sciences, National Museums Scotland, Chambers Street, Edinburgh EH1 1JF, UK
- ORCID
- Buckley, Michael
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2017-05-31
- Volume
- 284
- Issue
- 1855
- Pages
- 20170544
- ISSN
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- PMC
- PMC5454271
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/M001814/1)
- Royal Society (UF120473)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review